2022
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.942633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear–Electron Correlation Effects and Their Photoelectron Imprint in Molecular XUV Ionisation

Abstract: The ionisation of molecules by attosecond XUV pulses is accompanied by complex correlated dynamics, such as the creation of coherent electron wave packets in the parent ion, their interplay with nuclear wave packets, and a correlated photoelectron moving in a multi-centred potential. Additionally, these processes are influenced by the dynamics prior to and during the ionisation. To fully understand and subsequently control the ionisation process on different time scales, a profound understanding of electron an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is yet to be addressed how temporal dynamic interference effects are present for these kind of pulses and have to be thoughtfully dissected from the CEP-and intensitydependent effects unraveled in this work. Moreover, it has been shown recently that electronic and nuclear correlation lead to asymmetries in the PES during XUV ionization [56], therefore, the interplay with the asymmetry from attosecond pulses reported here would be of future interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is yet to be addressed how temporal dynamic interference effects are present for these kind of pulses and have to be thoughtfully dissected from the CEP-and intensitydependent effects unraveled in this work. Moreover, it has been shown recently that electronic and nuclear correlation lead to asymmetries in the PES during XUV ionization [56], therefore, the interplay with the asymmetry from attosecond pulses reported here would be of future interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%