2010
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20100208003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear dissipation effects on fission and evaporation in systems of intermediate fissility

Abstract: Abstract. The systems of intermediate fissility 132 Ce and 158 Er have been studied experimentally and theoretically in order to investigate the dissipation properties of nuclear matter. Cross sections of fusion-fission and evaporation residues channels together with charged particles multiplicities in both channels, their spectra, angular correlations and mass-energy distribution of fission fragments have been measured. Theoretical analysis has been performed using multi-dimensional stochastic approach with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and energy spectra obtained in Ref. [29] for fission fragments from 200-MeV 32 S on 100 Mo. The measured average energy is 68.7 MeV, to which should be added about 3 MeV from stopping in the target, and the result is 2 MeV above the value calculated from a total fission energy release of 46 MeV per fragment [29].…”
Section: A Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and energy spectra obtained in Ref. [29] for fission fragments from 200-MeV 32 S on 100 Mo. The measured average energy is 68.7 MeV, to which should be added about 3 MeV from stopping in the target, and the result is 2 MeV above the value calculated from a total fission energy release of 46 MeV per fragment [29].…”
Section: A Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This may be justified by the fact that the maximum value of the spin is otherwise much larger than the critical value, I c , corresponding to B f = 0. This is not the case for 32 S bombardment and the discrepancy between measured and calculated cross sections must for this case be found elsewhere, perhaps in the competition from emission of light, charged particles [29][30][31]. The omission of these channels in the simulations is a deficiency but it appears difficult to include them in a consistent manner [30,31].…”
Section: Statistical Simulations Of Fissionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This improvement would be of interest also in case of modeling dynamically the descent from saddle to scission by means of Langevin framework. Indeed, various observables relevant to the fission dynamics have been thoroughly studied in the case of binary decay of 132 Ce [27], a compound nucleus close to the 118 Ba nucleus. While a wide set of observables could be reproduced by the model assuming the time evolution of the system on potential energy surface given by the three dimensions FRLDM, the model fails to explain the TKE distribution with underestimation of the variance by about 40%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%