2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear data uncertainty for criticality-safety: Monte Carlo vs. linear perturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it can be mentioned that in certain criticality calculations noticeable differences were observed between the nominal values of the calculation outputs obtained with nominal nuclear data libraries versus the sample mean values, obtained with randomly sampled libraries together with the sample skewness different from zero [38]. Similar observations are now under analysis for the dosimetry calculations.…”
Section: General Description and Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it can be mentioned that in certain criticality calculations noticeable differences were observed between the nominal values of the calculation outputs obtained with nominal nuclear data libraries versus the sample mean values, obtained with randomly sampled libraries together with the sample skewness different from zero [38]. Similar observations are now under analysis for the dosimetry calculations.…”
Section: General Description and Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…With the modern computation capabilities the stochastic sampling approach became also attractive for uncertainty quantifications and in the last decade a number of computation tools has been developed over the world towards the propagation of nuclear data uncertainties in neutronic calculations, ranging from tools for "simple" criticality stationary calculations, up to time-dependent calculations (including isotopic kinetics/fuel depletion and reactor dynamics/transient modeling in the vocabulary of nuclear engineering community) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. When it is possible, the stochastic and deterministic methods are cross-verified against each other [33,37,39] or even work in combination to provide the best capabilities for calculation simulations and results analysis [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have already been used and characterized in previous work, see for instance references [2,3,26]. All possible nuclear data are varied, such as cross sections, angular distributions, emitted spectra and multiplicities.…”
Section: Correlation From Integral Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many simulation tools are capable of using such matrices to propagate nuclear data uncertainties on final quantities, with either perturbation theories [1][2][3][4][5][6], or Monte Carlo sampling [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. These results can for instance be used for the review procedure of new facilities, or during the safety assessment of new reactor core designs [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term uncertainty as used in this work is represented by an estimated one standard deviation of the distribution under consideration. The TMC method has been presented extensively in several references: [3,4,19,20,21] as well as applied to many applications: [10,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The first step in our updating scheme involves the identification of model input parameters (and the corresponding parameter widths) that play significant roles in defining or characterizing the reaction observables of interest.…”
Section: Updating Schemementioning
confidence: 99%