Nuclear data sheets update for A = 57

Bhat, M.R.

doi:10.1016/0090-3752(92)80020-k

Cited by 29 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 197 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reduced magnetic transition probability B(M1) and the energies of the nuclear levels are taken from Refs. [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Recombination into the K shell is possible for all the chosen ions, except for Gd.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantum interference between nuclear excitation by electron capture and radiative recombination

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the quantum interference between the resonant process of nuclear excitation by electron capture ͑NEEC͒ followed by the radiative decay of the excited nucleus, and radiative recombination ͑RR͒. In order to derive the interference cross section, a Feshbach projection operator formalism is used. The electromagnetic field is considered by means of multipole fields. The nucleus is described by a phenomenological collective model and by making use of experimental data. The Fano profile parameters as well as the interference cross section for electric and magnetic multipole transitions in various heavy ions are presented. We discuss the experimental possibility of discerning NEEC from the RR background.In this section we derive the total cross section of the recombination process involving NEEC followed by the radiative decay of the nucleus and RR by means of a Feshbach projection operator formalism. We consider that the electron is captured into the bound state of a bare ion or an ion with a closed-shell configuration. We calculate the interference term between NEEC followed by the radiative decay of the excited nucleus and RR in the total cross section for electric and magnetic multipole transitions of the nucleus. A. The interference between RR and NEEC in the total cross sectionThe initial state ͉⌿ i ͘ of the system describing the nucleus in its ground state, the free electron, and the vacuum state of *Electronic address:Adriana-Claudia.Gagyi-Palffy@unigiessen.de † Electronic address: Harman@mpi-hd.mpg.de PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 012709 ͑2007͒

show abstract

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantum interference between nuclear excitation by electron capture and radiative recombination

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The electronic radial integrals are calculated numerically using the same type of wave functions for the bound and continuum electron as for the electric transitions. The reduced magnetic transition probability B ↓ (M1) and the energies of the nuclear levels are taken from [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Capture into the K shell is possible for all the chosen ions, except for the 157 64 Gd isotope.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theory of nuclear excitation by electron capture for heavy ions

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the resonant process of nuclear excitation by electron capture, in which a continuum electron is captured into a bound state of an ion with the simultaneous excitation of the nucleus. In order to derive the cross section a Feshbach projection operator formalism is introduced. Nuclear states and transitions are described by a nuclear collective model and making use of experimental data. Transition rates and total cross sections for NEEC followed by the radiative decay of the excited nucleus are calculated for various heavy ion collision systems.

show abstract

“…[22], these single-particle energies were fit upon by making assumptions regarding spin assignments for excited levels in 57 Cu and 59 Zn. In retrospect, these levels are probably not appropriate for determining parameters for heavier nuclei because of uncertainties in spin assignments and the fact that the levels comprising the assumed doublet at 1.040 MeV in 57 Cu [23] are unbound, and strong…”

Section: Shell-model Calculations Of Coulomb Energy Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the proton drip line up toA=70

1997

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coulomb energy differences between mirror nuclei with Aр70 are calculated within the framework of the nuclear shell model using an effective Coulomb plus isovector and isotensor interaction. Absolute binding energies for proton-rich nuclei are predicted by adding the calculated Coulomb shifts to experimentally measured binding energies for the neutron-rich mirror. The location of the proton drip line is investigated, as well as candidates for the exotic decay mode known as diproton emission. Taking into account the lifetimes of competing decay modes and limits imposed by experimental setups, it is concluded that the best candidates for the observation of correlated diproton emission are 45 Fe, 48 Ni, and 63 Se.

show abstract

Nuclear data sheets update for A = 57

Cited by 29 publications

References 197 publications

Quantum interference between nuclear excitation by electron capture and radiative recombination

Quantum interference between nuclear excitation by electron capture and radiative recombination

Theory of nuclear excitation by electron capture for heavy ions

Mapping the proton drip line up toA=70

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About