2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 86

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 294 publications
0
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5, in particular analysis B, with the optimized branching-ratio matrix, which provides a larger ground-state feeding value. As in the 91 Rb case, the two total absorption results clearly differ from the ENSDF data [42] based on high-resolution measurements, which points to a decay suffering from the Pandemonium effect. From our conventional analysis (analysis A), a ground-state feeding of 15.01% is obtained, the optimized branching-ratio-matrix analysis result is larger, amounting to 20.23%, but still in agreement with the ENSDF value within the error interval [15(8)%].…”
Section: Decay Of 86 Brcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5, in particular analysis B, with the optimized branching-ratio matrix, which provides a larger ground-state feeding value. As in the 91 Rb case, the two total absorption results clearly differ from the ENSDF data [42] based on high-resolution measurements, which points to a decay suffering from the Pandemonium effect. From our conventional analysis (analysis A), a ground-state feeding of 15.01% is obtained, the optimized branching-ratio-matrix analysis result is larger, amounting to 20.23%, but still in agreement with the ENSDF value within the error interval [15(8)%].…”
Section: Decay Of 86 Brcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Up to the level at an excitation energy of 3099 keV, only two levels have uncertain spin-parity assignments. In addition, a recent ENSDF evaluation [42] has included some new levels from a 86 Kr(n,n ) 86 Kr study from Fotiades et al [43] and slightly revised the excitation energies of some levels compared with the earlier evaluation [44].…”
Section: Decay Of 86 Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It maintains a rather high value at N = 58 before it significantly drops at the onset of collectivity at N = 60. For Sr [50][51][52][53][54]56], Kr [50][51][52][53]56,57], and Se [49,57,59] isotopes, no such peaking of the 2 + 1 energies is found, but rather a flat behavior up to N = 58. Nevertheless, a slight increase in the 2 + 1 energy at N = 56 is observed for 92 Kr and 88 Ge (this work).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a few years of activity in the field and after the competion of two full mass chain evaluations in collaboration with an experienced evaluator [9,10], the group from IFIN-HH became in 2015 one of the NSDD Data Centres. Two scientist dedicate 20% of their working time to this activity.…”
Section: The Data Centre At Ifin-hhmentioning
confidence: 99%