2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 156

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 359 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two histograms are normalized by the total number of events. We can see some prominent peaks at 181, 1187, 5903 and 6750 keV in the data, which agree with the values given in the Nuclear Data Sheets [13] within the present calibration error (20 keV). We do not observe these peaks in the MC.…”
Section: Gadolinium (supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two histograms are normalized by the total number of events. We can see some prominent peaks at 181, 1187, 5903 and 6750 keV in the data, which agree with the values given in the Nuclear Data Sheets [13] within the present calibration error (20 keV). We do not observe these peaks in the MC.…”
Section: Gadolinium (supporting
confidence: 91%
“…We incorporated the GEANT4 MC simulation into the detector, and compared the data with the results of the MC simulation. We observed some prominent peaks at 181, 1187, 5903 and 6750 keV in our data and found that these peaks agree with those in Nuclear Data Sheets [13] within the present calibration error (20 keV), but we did not see such prominent peaks in the MC. On the other hand, we see strong peaks at 3576, 3740, 3840, 3920, 4016, 4117 and 4360 keV in the Geant4 simulation, but we did not see them in our data.…”
Section: Gadolinium (supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to test the features of the phase transitional behavior of two-nucleon transfer intensities, we have analyzed experiments in Gd, Sm and Nd [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. To this end, we have first diagonalized the Hamiltonian, Eq.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in the present work they are locally determined from an Fvector E2 transition discussed above and from the transition strength of 189(3) W.u. [33] for the F -scalar E2 transition from the 2 + 1 state to the ground state of the very same nucleus, 156 Gd. The corresponding reduction of (e π − e ν ) 2 by about one order of magnitude with respect to previous estimates [32], and a correspondingly small E2 excitation strength from the ground state, explains why the 2 + sc state has remained largely undetected in the past.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%