2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 237

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no α decay of 241 Am to an excited level of 237 Np with energy larger than 0.8 MeV has been observed, to our knowledge and in the decay scheme of 241 Am [20] 2 , a contribution of 241 Am decay in the applied coincidence energy windows is not expected. Hence, a possible excess with respect to the data obtained when running without sources is due to the sources but not directly to the known 241 Am decay scheme [20].…”
Section: The First Dedicated Runmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since no α decay of 241 Am to an excited level of 237 Np with energy larger than 0.8 MeV has been observed, to our knowledge and in the decay scheme of 241 Am [20] 2 , a contribution of 241 Am decay in the applied coincidence energy windows is not expected. Hence, a possible excess with respect to the data obtained when running without sources is due to the sources but not directly to the known 241 Am decay scheme [20].…”
Section: The First Dedicated Runmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The scatter plots in Fig. 1b [20] obtained by simulation (the number of displayed events is normalized to the same time as the case a) and applying the sources activities given in Table 2 Fig. 1a) with E 1 in the 100-150 keV energy window, the spectrum of E 2 is produced and reported in Fig.…”
Section: The Cumulative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection efficiency as a function of position from the detector head yields an additional variation of ±2% due to the target holder position. (35.90 ± 0.07)% [17]. In addition, in the range between 70 keV and 80 keV, full energy true coincidence summing peaks of the three X-rays and the main γ-ray line of 241 Am are clearly visible.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[3]. Differences in the recommended half-lives when compared with the equivalent data from recent ENSDF evaluations [4,5] arise from variations in the evaluation technique [1,3,6], especially the use of the limitation of relative statistical weights (LRSW method) in the DDEP statistical procedure.…”
Section: Half-livesmentioning
confidence: 99%