2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A=140

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 377 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These T 1/2 are not consistent with the reported value of 0.553 (46) s deduced from the time distribution of β rays in the β ray of 140 I from the same EURICA data [23]. And also, these T 1/2 do not correspond to the reported values of 0.59(1) and 0.86(4) s, which were determined in experiments of fission fragments using a mass separation system [25] and a gas-flow system [26,27], respectively. To solve this discrepancy between these T 1/2 , an additional isomer may be expected with longer T 1/2 than those of the g.s.…”
Section: Low-spin Isomer In 140 Icontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These T 1/2 are not consistent with the reported value of 0.553 (46) s deduced from the time distribution of β rays in the β ray of 140 I from the same EURICA data [23]. And also, these T 1/2 do not correspond to the reported values of 0.59(1) and 0.86(4) s, which were determined in experiments of fission fragments using a mass separation system [25] and a gas-flow system [26,27], respectively. To solve this discrepancy between these T 1/2 , an additional isomer may be expected with longer T 1/2 than those of the g.s.…”
Section: Low-spin Isomer In 140 Icontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…6(a). This T 1/2 of 0.91(5) s corresponds to 0.86(4) s [26,27]. Therefore, the half-lives of 0.553 (46) s [23] and 0.59(1) s [25] are presumed to correspond to a mixture of the components of the β decay of the g.s., HSI, and this low-spin isomer (LSI) in 140 I.…”
Section: Low-spin Isomer In 140 Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal γ-ray energies, intensities, and appropriate branching ratios (if necessary) used in this study (Table 2) were acquired from the Nuclear Data Sheets (Artna-Cohen, 1997; Browne, 2001;Burrows, 2001;Sonzogni, 2001;Browne, 2005;Basunia, 2007;Kumar Jain et al, 2007;Nica, 2007;Browne and Tuli, 2011;Singh et al, 2011;Browne and Tuli, 2012;Nica, 2014).…”
Section: Gamma-ray Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering QRPA calculation, it could be seen clearly that for each isotope chain, the calculated deviation would increase with the neutron number, which also means the increase of the deformation. For gross calculation, the better results got for 138 Xe, 140 Xe, 144 Ba, 154 Nd and 158 Sm nu- [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and calculated E β by the Gross [21,22] and QRPA; (e) Comparison between experimental [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and calculated E γ by the Gross [21,22] and QRPA Table 1. The ratios of E 1 4+ and E 1 2+ , level numbers for daughter nuclei, level density and deviation between calculations and experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%