1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00043044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear behaviour of colonies and regenerated buds from protoplasts ofNicotiana plumbaginifolia Viviani haploids

Abstract: The ploidy level variations of protoplast cultures of Nicotiana plumbaginifolta Viviani (n = 10) were investigated from protoplast isolation until regenerated buds, using cytophotometric measurements of nuclear DNA content and chromosome counting. An increase in the average nuclear DNA amount has been found to occur in freshly isolated protoplasts after 15 hours of maceration. Cytological abnormalities like nuclear fragmentation, chromatin connections between interphasic nuclei and micronuclei were observed du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of viability is used as a criterion to determine the quality of protoplasts after enzymatic digestion. However, enzymatic structural variability, which results in anomalies in digestion during cell division and in plants regenerated from protoplasts ( Cambecedes et al., 1988 ). In this study, although high-yield (5×10 6 protoplasts/g FW) and high-vitality (> 90%) protoplasts were obtained by optimizing the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions, the cell membranes of the protoplasts perforated to different degrees post enzymolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of viability is used as a criterion to determine the quality of protoplasts after enzymatic digestion. However, enzymatic structural variability, which results in anomalies in digestion during cell division and in plants regenerated from protoplasts ( Cambecedes et al., 1988 ). In this study, although high-yield (5×10 6 protoplasts/g FW) and high-vitality (> 90%) protoplasts were obtained by optimizing the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions, the cell membranes of the protoplasts perforated to different degrees post enzymolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the enzymatic solution disrupts not only the physiologic function but also the cytologic at molecular mechanisms of protoplasts ( Fu and Zhuang, 2001 ). Isolation generates structural variability, thereby causing anomalies during cell division ( Tylicki et al., 2002 ), as well as in plants regenerated from protoplasts ( Cambecedes et al., 1988 ). These anomalies often hinder the introduction of new plant varieties obtained via in vitro protoplast fusion ( Handley et al., 1986 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of viability is usually used as a criterion to determine the quality of the protoplasts after enzymatic digestion. However, enzymatic digestion generates structural variability resulting in anomalies observed during cell division as well as in plants regenerated from protoplasts (Cambecedes et al, 1988). These anomalies often hinder the introduction of new plant varieties obtained by methods of in vitro protoplast fusion (Handley et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the enzymatic solution disrupts not only physiologic function but also protoplast cytology and molecule level (Fu, 2001). Isolation generates structural variability, resulting in anomalies observed during cell division (Tylicki, 2002), as well as in plants regenerated from protoplasts (Cambecedes et al, 1988). These anomalies often hinder the introduction of new plant varieties obtained by methods of in vitro protoplast fusion (Handley et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50% of premitotic Vicia hajastana protoplasts (Simmonds 1986;Simmonds and Setterfield 1986). This indicates that the procedure of protoplast isolation generates structural variability (Korlach and Zoglauer 1995;Zhang et al 1998;Tylicki et al 2002), resulting in anomalies observed during cell division (Meijer and Simmonds 1988), as well as in plants regenerated from protoplasts (Cambecedes et al 1988). These anomalies often hinder introduction of new plant varieties obtained by methods of in vitro protoplast fusion (Handley et al 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%