2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear and cpDNA sequences combined provide strong inference of higher phylogenetic relationships in the phlox family (Polemoniaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gielly and Taberlet (1994) showed that introns and intergenic spacers evolve 1.93-11.72 times faster than rbcL and that indels occur as often as nucleotide substitutions. Thus, different chloroplast sites can also result in a different phylogenetic status of plant species because they have different evolutionary rates (Freeland 2005;Johnson et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gielly and Taberlet (1994) showed that introns and intergenic spacers evolve 1.93-11.72 times faster than rbcL and that indels occur as often as nucleotide substitutions. Thus, different chloroplast sites can also result in a different phylogenetic status of plant species because they have different evolutionary rates (Freeland 2005;Johnson et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not present in all species (e.g. Eriastrum eremicum, figure 6g; P. divaricata; Schö nenberger 2009), connective protrusions seem particularly well developed in taxa belonging to early diverging lineages of the family (for phylogenetic relationship within Polemoniaceae, see Johnson et al 2008) such as A. gloriosa (figure 6h) and C. coerulea (figure 6j ) (Schö nenberger 2009). Again, this is particularly interesting, because conspicuous connective protrusions are characteristics of the sister family Fouquieriaceae (Henrickson 1972;Schö nenberger 2009).…”
Section: Phlox Divaricata)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We isolated DNA and PCR amplified the nuclear ribosomal ITS1, 5.8s, and ITS2 region (White et al 1990, Porter 1996, the plastid 5' trnK intron and 5' portion of matK (Johnson & Solits 1995, Johnson & Johnson 2006, trnL-trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and intron (Taberlet et al 1991), trnS-trnG intergenic spacer (Hamilton 1999), and rpl16 regions (Small et al 1998). Our methods for amplification and sequencing follow Johnson et al (2008), and we deposited the DNA sequences in Genbank (accession numbers KX017843-KX017976; HQ116860, HQ116865, HQ116961, HQ116966, HQ117005, HQ117011, HQ117046, HQ117051, HQ117085, HQ117090). We aligned sequences by eye using AliView (Larsson 2014) and coded indels as present or absent using simple indel coding (Simmons & Ochoterena 2000) as implemented in SeqState (Muller 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%