2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear alterations associated to programmed cell death in larval salivary glands of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Highly picnotic nuclei indicate low transcriptional activity due to chromatinic compacting, suggesting that the cells are in an advanced cell death process (Häcker 2000;Silva-Zacarin et al 2008). In midgut cells already in the lumen, for instance, nuclear picnosis indicates that these cells are already dead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly picnotic nuclei indicate low transcriptional activity due to chromatinic compacting, suggesting that the cells are in an advanced cell death process (Häcker 2000;Silva-Zacarin et al 2008). In midgut cells already in the lumen, for instance, nuclear picnosis indicates that these cells are already dead.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programmed cell death (PCD) is extensively studied in humans (in the context of oncology), in vertebrates (mainly in mammals), and also in invertebrates like insects, both in vivo and in vitro (see Buss et al 2006), especially on metamorphosis and larval development (Bowen et al 1996;Silva-Zacarin et al 2006, 2007, and in nematodes. All these investigations are based on experiments that focus mostly on one kind of tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidermal cells of exocrine glands are class I with secretory features in newly emerged F. schrottkyi workers. However, large nuclei with decondensed chromatin in the spherical class III secretory cells suggest high activity (Silva-Zacarin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%