2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.22.111427
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NTR 2.0: a rationally-engineered prodrug converting enzyme with substantially enhanced efficacy for targeted cell ablation

Abstract: Heterologously-expressed bacterial nitroreductase (NTR) enzymes sensitize eukaryotic cells to prodrugs such as metronidazole (MTZ), enabling selective cell ablation paradigms that have expanded studies of cell function and regeneration in vertebrate systems. However, first-generation NTRs require confoundingly toxic prodrug treatments (e.g. 10 mM MTZ) and some cell types have proven resistant. We used rational engineering and cross-species screening to develop a NTR variant, NTR 2.0, which exhibits ~100-fold i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the IC 50 for this cell line with nitro-CBI-DEI is nearly 2-fold improved over HCT-116 cells expressing E. coli NfsB ( Wilson et al, 2009 ; the only previous report of a human cell line IC 50 for nitro-CBI-DEI), while the IC 50 with CB1954 is comparable to those of the top five nitroreductase-expressing HCT-116 lines examined in a broad survey of 47 promising nitroreductase candidates ( Prosser et al, 2013 ). Most notably, the IC 50 with metronidazole is nearly three logs better than the IC 50 we previously measured for E. coli NfsB expressed in the same HEK-293 cell line ( Sharrock et al, 2020 ). Escherichia coli NfsB has been widely used in transgenic animal models, in particular zebrafish, to ablate promoter-defined cell types; however, these models have frequently been confounded by a requirement to apply near-toxic (or even toxic) doses of metronidazole to achieve effective cell ablation ( Mathias et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the IC 50 for this cell line with nitro-CBI-DEI is nearly 2-fold improved over HCT-116 cells expressing E. coli NfsB ( Wilson et al, 2009 ; the only previous report of a human cell line IC 50 for nitro-CBI-DEI), while the IC 50 with CB1954 is comparable to those of the top five nitroreductase-expressing HCT-116 lines examined in a broad survey of 47 promising nitroreductase candidates ( Prosser et al, 2013 ). Most notably, the IC 50 with metronidazole is nearly three logs better than the IC 50 we previously measured for E. coli NfsB expressed in the same HEK-293 cell line ( Sharrock et al, 2020 ). Escherichia coli NfsB has been widely used in transgenic animal models, in particular zebrafish, to ablate promoter-defined cell types; however, these models have frequently been confounded by a requirement to apply near-toxic (or even toxic) doses of metronidazole to achieve effective cell ablation ( Mathias et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Escherichia coli NfsB has been widely used in transgenic animal models, in particular zebrafish, to ablate promoter-defined cell types; however, these models have frequently been confounded by a requirement to apply near-toxic (or even toxic) doses of metronidazole to achieve effective cell ablation ( Mathias et al, 2014 ). We recently addressed this limitation by developing “NTR 2.0” - a rationally engineered variant of Vibrio vulnificus that achieves effective cell ablation in transgenic zebrafish at 100-fold lower doses of metronidazole ( Sharrock et al, 2020 ). In HEK-293 cells, variant 11_78 confers a 1.5-fold lower IC 50 than even NTR 2.0, suggesting it will also be highly effective for targeted ablation applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line, rods co-express membrane-tagged YFP and an improved NTR ("NTR 2.0"). The membrane-tagged YFP facilitates improved imaging of rod outer segments, while NTR 2.0 enables cell ablation at a reduced concentration of Mtz (e.g., 10 µM versus 2.5 mM; (Sharrock et al, 2020)). To assess if lead compounds preserved outer segment morphologies, intravital confocal imaging was performed as above but using the ).…”
Section: Zebrafish Model Validation Iv: Confocal Intravital Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for example the case of the pancreas and the liver where the zebrafish NTR model is almost exclusively employed in contrast to the various mice models of injury that are used to cover regeneration from different cellular sources ( Table 1 ) [ 31 , 33 , 67 ]. The NTR model is also exploited to study regeneration in the heart and the brain and is continuously improving [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. Although this relatively simple model provides valuable clues about regeneration, zebrafish models recapitulating more closely the disease will determine how zebrafish regenerate in such settings, therefore further increasing our understanding of regeneration and the success of transposition to mammals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%