2019
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ab023a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NSTX/NSTX-U theory, modeling and analysis results

Abstract: The mission of the spherical tokamak NSTX-U is to explore the physics that drives core and pedestal transport and stability at high- and low collisionality, as part of the development of the spherical tokamak (ST) concept towards a compact, low-cost ST-based pilot plant. NSTX-U will ultimately operate at up to 2 MA and 1 T with up to 12 MW of neutral beam injection power for 5 s. NSTX-U will operate in a regime where electromagnetic instabilities are expected to dominate transport, and beam-heated NSTX-U plasm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these conditions place constraints on the beam parameters (λ 0 , v 0 /v A , as well as Δλ for co-CAEs) and mode properties for a mode to be driven unstable by a neutral beam distribution. Similarly to our previous analysis, equations (9) and (10) demonstrate that cntr-GAEs and co-GAEs have complementary instability conditions resulting from opposing signs of in the resonances driving these modes. Consequently, co-GAE excitation is favored when λ 0 is small, while cntr-GAEs prefer large λ 0 .…”
Section: Approximate Stability Boundariessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Hence, these conditions place constraints on the beam parameters (λ 0 , v 0 /v A , as well as Δλ for co-CAEs) and mode properties for a mode to be driven unstable by a neutral beam distribution. Similarly to our previous analysis, equations (9) and (10) demonstrate that cntr-GAEs and co-GAEs have complementary instability conditions resulting from opposing signs of in the resonances driving these modes. Consequently, co-GAE excitation is favored when λ 0 is small, while cntr-GAEs prefer large λ 0 .…”
Section: Approximate Stability Boundariessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Disruption of the plasma current leading to thermal and current quenches, halo currents [53,54], and heat and electromagnetic forces on the device structure were tolerated in NSTX experiments as the energy in the disruptions was not high enough to cause damage to the device. A reduced kinetic model for resistive wall mode stability based upon theoretical understanding has already been included in DECAF [2]. Here we will briefly describe the kinetic model and its underlying ideal stability components.…”
Section: Ideal Mhd Stability In the Nstx Spherical Tokamakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DCON stability code was developed to calculate A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t the fluid δW terms and was previously used for thousands of calculations spanning the NSTX operating space [7]. Analysis of these thousands of calculations formed the basis of an analytical model for the fluid δW terms that was incorporated into the DECAF code [2]. Improvements to that model now by means of machine learning is examined in this paper.…”
Section: Ideal Mhd Stability In the Nstx Spherical Tokamakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical Tokamaks (STs) are an attractive design option for a fusion reactor that promises significant cost reduction because of its compact size and denser confined plasmas [1][2][3][4]. However, there are still open questions regarding ST physics, particularly regarding the physics of fast ions that are produced through fusion reactions or neutral beam injection (NBI) [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%