2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NR2A-containing NMDA receptors are required for LTP induction in rat dorsolateral striatum in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High frequency stimulation (HFS) trains, in accord with previous reports (Partridge et al, 2000; Fino et al, 2005; Marrone et al, 2006; Li et al, 2009), did not trigger lasting potentiation of striatal EPSPs when administered in the presence of APV (Fig 2A), indicating that NMDARs are necessary for induction but by themselves do not express LTP. As noted, APV substantially reduced pre-HFS baseline responses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High frequency stimulation (HFS) trains, in accord with previous reports (Partridge et al, 2000; Fino et al, 2005; Marrone et al, 2006; Li et al, 2009), did not trigger lasting potentiation of striatal EPSPs when administered in the presence of APV (Fig 2A), indicating that NMDARs are necessary for induction but by themselves do not express LTP. As noted, APV substantially reduced pre-HFS baseline responses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Neurons were also filled with Neurobiotin or AlexaFluor 488 for subsequent morphological confirmation (Fig 1B). EPSPs, recorded in the presence of the GABA-A receptor antagonist picrotoxin, were comparable to those described in the literature (Rohrbacher et al, 1994; Moriguchi et al, 2002; Li et al, 2009) and were notable for having a slow decay constant. Previous studies have described a significant NMDAR-mediated component to EPSPs recorded from MSNs (Li et al, 2009) and, in agreement with this, we found that the AMPAR antagonist CNQX reduced the amplitude of cortically evoked responses by almost half; the remainder of the fast response was eliminated by the NMDAR antagonist APV (Fig 1C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This difference between wide and narrow timing intervals is significant for the Ifenprodil condition (p<0.05; Figure 4D). These results demonstrate that GluN2 subunits not only control whether potentiation occurs, as previous studies have shown [26][28], but also that they hone plasticity, making it sensitive to wider or narrower time intervals between pre-synaptic neurotransmitter release and post-synaptic firing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In addition, GluN2A, because of its fast decay time, results in a narrowing of the STDP curve (compared to GluN2B) by decreasing the Δt that permits sufficient calcium influx. While previous studies have focused on whether a particular GluN2 subunit is necessary for plasticity [26][28], we have shown that the relationship between GluN2 subunit and plasticity is more complex than simply allowing or preventing LTP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In the striatum, long‐term potentiation (LTP) and long‐term depression (LTD) are believed to underlie motor learning. NMDARs, in particular those containing GluN2A, are involved in LTP, but not LTD, induction in the striatum . Several studies have shown that LTP and LTD are lost in the striatum of animal models of PD and that aberrant synaptic plasticity occurs in models of L‐DOPA‐induced dyskinesia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%