1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2860(89)85040-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NQR multiple-pulse spin-locking as a method of study of molecular motions in solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulse angular duration is not determined in powder NQR, so, by analogy with NMR, we have considered that θ x = π 2 when the induction decay amplitude is maximum and θ x = π when it is minimum. The validity of such an approach in some multipulse experiments has been confirmed previously [12].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The pulse angular duration is not determined in powder NQR, so, by analogy with NMR, we have considered that θ x = π 2 when the induction decay amplitude is maximum and θ x = π when it is minimum. The validity of such an approach in some multipulse experiments has been confirmed previously [12].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This means that in a powder with possible such orientations, the observed magnetization, M, will be the superposition of the magnetization associated with individual crystalline. Nevertheless, the experimental results of the dependence of M (θ ) for the polycrystalline sample is similar to those of monocrystalline one in the range of θ from 0 up 3π/2 [12], which makes it possible to use the concept of the angular pulse duration for the polycrystalline sample. Using the projection operators e i mn for the nuclear spins I and ε …”
Section: Hamiltonian Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…By analogy with NMR, we had considered, that θ = π 2 when the induction decay amplitude is maximum and at θ = π it is minimum. The validity of such an approach in some multipulse experiments has been confirmed early [12]. The length of θ = π/2 was 7.5 μs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%