2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NqA: An R-based algorithm for the normalization and analysis of microRNA quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within each treatment arm (i.e., trastuzumab, lapatinib, and their combination) and timing of blood collection (i.e., T0 and T1), the following workflow was applied: the relative quantity (RQ) of each miRNA was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method following the formula 2^-DCq where DCq ¼ Cq miRNA -Cq reference (38). The Cq reference was computed by averaging the Cq values of the reference miRNAs identified by an updated version of the NqA algorithm (39). The RQ of each miRNA, expressed in logarithmic scale (log 2 RQ ¼ ÀDCq), was then analyzed in univariate manner to identify those miRNAs statistically associated with pCR.…”
Section: Ct-mirna Profiling Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each treatment arm (i.e., trastuzumab, lapatinib, and their combination) and timing of blood collection (i.e., T0 and T1), the following workflow was applied: the relative quantity (RQ) of each miRNA was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method following the formula 2^-DCq where DCq ¼ Cq miRNA -Cq reference (38). The Cq reference was computed by averaging the Cq values of the reference miRNAs identified by an updated version of the NqA algorithm (39). The RQ of each miRNA, expressed in logarithmic scale (log 2 RQ ¼ ÀDCq), was then analyzed in univariate manner to identify those miRNAs statistically associated with pCR.…”
Section: Ct-mirna Profiling Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subject was classified as: no lesion (NL, including negative or no neoplastic lesions), LgA, HgA and cancerous lesion (CL, including cancerized adenoma and carcinomas), according to the worst endoscopic lesion recorded in the LHA register. By running an updated version of the normalization quantitative polymerase chain reaction array R‐function developed in the study, the data were normalized according to the overall mean and a subset of reference miRNAs that best resembled the results with the overall mean was identified. The nonparametric Kruskal‐Wallis test, adopting a nominal α value of 5%, was applied to the log 2 (RQ) distributions (where relative quantity [RQ] = 2 −ΔCt ) to identify miRNAs that showed significantly different expression in subjects with proliferative lesions compared to those without lesions (NL) and then within each specific proliferative lesion (LgA, HgA or CL) compared to NL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplification curves were analyzed using the Roche LC software for determination of quantification cycle (Cq) values. The relative quantity (RQ) of each ct-miRNA was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle method following the formula 2ˆ-DCq where DCq = (Cq miRNA − Cq reference) [35], where the Cq reference was computed by considering the Cq average of all the detected miRNAs (global mean approach) [36,37]. The RQ of each miRNA, expressed in logarithmic scale (log2 RQ), was then used for the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Ct-mirna Profiling Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%