2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/mhnqd
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Now you hear me, later you don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech

Abstract: (Accepted and In Press at Psychological Science)What happens to the acoustic signal after it enters the mind of a listener? Previous work demonstrates that listeners maintain intermediate representations over time. However, the internal structure of such representations—be they the acoustic-phonetic signal or more general information about the probability of possible categories—remains underspecified. We present two experiments using a novel speaker adaptation paradigm aimed at uncovering the format of speech … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important area of future research is to investigate the extent to which these response scale effects are a result of how communication modalities interface with the cognitive structure of individuals' beliefs. For example, it may be that individuals' mental representations of news veracity are probabilistic in nature, such that binary signaling prevents them from expressing improvements in their internal beliefs during communication [34][35][36]. Future work may also find that, since individual cognition combines both categorical and probabilistic judgments, the optimal communication modality for social learning involves a combination of categorical and binary signaling [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important area of future research is to investigate the extent to which these response scale effects are a result of how communication modalities interface with the cognitive structure of individuals' beliefs. For example, it may be that individuals' mental representations of news veracity are probabilistic in nature, such that binary signaling prevents them from expressing improvements in their internal beliefs during communication [34][35][36]. Future work may also find that, since individual cognition combines both categorical and probabilistic judgments, the optimal communication modality for social learning involves a combination of categorical and binary signaling [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%