2009
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65852-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novosphingobium acidiphilum sp. nov., an acidophilic salt-sensitive bacterium isolated from the humic acid-rich Lake Grosse Fuchskuhle

Abstract: A yellow-to orange-pigmented, Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile and non-spore-forming bacterium, strain FSW06-204d T , was isolated from subsurface water of the acidic bog lake, Lake Grosse Fuchskuhle (Brandenburg, Germany). Optimum growth of this strain occurred over a pH range from 5.5 to 6.0 and the growth rate strongly decreased at pH values above 6.5. In addition, the strain exhibited a low tolerance towards NaCl and grew only at a NaCl concentration of up to 0.5 %. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Novosphingobium acidiphilum was frequently found in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of surface water samples from the SW basin (Glöckner et al ., 2000; Burkert et al ., 2003; Allgaier and Grossart, 2006b). Strains of N. acidiphilum were isolated from highest positive dilutions of MPN‐dilution series from C‐L and RB‐L incubations of both in situ and laboratory experiments in 2006 (data not shown, Glaeser et al ., 2009) and even after addition of phenol to water samples (Hutalle‐Schmelzer et al ., 2010). Resistance of N. acidiphilum to moderately increased [ 1 O 2 ] SS is most likely caused by cellular carotenoids (Glaeser et al ., 2009), which quench 1 O 2 and thereby provide efficient protection from photo‐oxidation (Tatsuzawa et al ., 1998; Glaeser and Klug, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novosphingobium acidiphilum was frequently found in 16S rRNA gene clone libraries of surface water samples from the SW basin (Glöckner et al ., 2000; Burkert et al ., 2003; Allgaier and Grossart, 2006b). Strains of N. acidiphilum were isolated from highest positive dilutions of MPN‐dilution series from C‐L and RB‐L incubations of both in situ and laboratory experiments in 2006 (data not shown, Glaeser et al ., 2009) and even after addition of phenol to water samples (Hutalle‐Schmelzer et al ., 2010). Resistance of N. acidiphilum to moderately increased [ 1 O 2 ] SS is most likely caused by cellular carotenoids (Glaeser et al ., 2009), which quench 1 O 2 and thereby provide efficient protection from photo‐oxidation (Tatsuzawa et al ., 1998; Glaeser and Klug, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…html). Strains assigned to the genus Novosphingobium have been isolated from diverse habitats including freshwater, soil, sea sediments, wastewater treatment plants, bioremediation reactor of contaminated ground water and hexachlorocyclohexane-contaminated soil (Yabuuchi et al, 1990;Takeuchi et al, 1995Takeuchi et al, , 2001Balkwill et al, 1997;Kämpfer et al, 2002Kämpfer et al, , 2011Fujii et al, 2003;Sohn et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005;Tiirola et al, 2005;Addison et al, 2007;Lim et al, 2007;Suzuki & Hiraishi, 2007;Glaeser et al, 2009Glaeser et al, , 2013Gupta et al, 2009;the study of long-term manure rotation effects on the rice endophytic microbial communities, more than 200 strains were isolated from rice roots (Zhang et al, 2013). Among those strains, ZYY112 T was identified as representing a potentially novel species of the genus Novosphingobium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data and previously published clone libraries [29], [30], [31] indicate the persistence of N. acidiphilum in the humic matter rich SW basin. Its relative abundance strongly increased during 1 O 2 exposure suggesting a high 1 O 2 resistance which can be explained by a high cellular carotenoid content [40]. In addition, Sphingomonadaceae are known to degrade aromatic compounds and N. acidiphilum was favoured by the addition of phenol that represents an important fraction of leached DOM [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%