2021
DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2021.1928024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty metrics in engineering design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarkar (2007) stated that a novel outcome is generated when it is not identical to any existing outcome(s). Fiorineschi and Rotini create a novelty map based on three dimensions: the concept of novelty underlying the metric, novelty type (P-Novelty vs. H-Novelty), and metric type (score assigned vs. score calculated) (Fiorineschi and Rotini, 2021).…”
Section: Disagreements In Bioinspired Ideation Effectiveness Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sarkar (2007) stated that a novel outcome is generated when it is not identical to any existing outcome(s). Fiorineschi and Rotini create a novelty map based on three dimensions: the concept of novelty underlying the metric, novelty type (P-Novelty vs. H-Novelty), and metric type (score assigned vs. score calculated) (Fiorineschi and Rotini, 2021).…”
Section: Disagreements In Bioinspired Ideation Effectiveness Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiorineschi and Rotini create a novelty map based on three dimensions: the concept of novelty underlying the metric, novelty type (P-Novelty vs. H-Novelty), and metric type (score assigned vs. score calculated) (Fiorineschi and Rotini, 2021). There are various approaches for determining novelty in ideas, concepts, and products.…”
Section: Novelty and Its Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most popular tests are based in some way on divergent thinking [24,25], which is more accurately a measure of creative potential [26]. The Consensual Assessment Technique [27] and comparable rating metrics [28,29] are highly regarded but very time and resource intensive [27,30]. Relying too exclusively on existing methods may be problematic for a number of reasons; most notably, such measures are intended to assess creative potential or ability.…”
Section: Positive Creativity In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, differently from methodological proposals specifically aimed at supporting engineering designers in industry-related activities, in this case, it is quite improbable to perform similar tests for validating actual effectiveness. More specifically, while for industry-related methods there are well-acknowledged sets of metrics to be used for assessing the effectiveness (e.g., from a creativity point of view [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]), it is difficult to understand what actually should be measured when designing models of ancient machines. One of the main issues in re-interpreting ancient technical documents is, of course, related to their subjectivity.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Work And Research Hintsmentioning
confidence: 99%