2015
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x15574937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty detection and dimension reduction via guided ultrasonic waves: Damage monitoring of scarf repairs in composite laminates

Abstract: This work focuses on structural health monitoring aspects of composite adhesively bonded repairs, evaluating their performance with guided ultrasonic waves. These repairs have shown remarkable potential in addressing repairability demands in new composite aircraft. More specifically, the behavior of a scarf repair under axial tensile loading was monitored with guided ultrasonic waves. The signal post-processing techniques focused on the extraction of the appropriate features, on the application of the pattern … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus a statistical analysis is needed to consider these various uncertainties. Since outlier analysis have been demonstrated as a robust unsupervised learning pattern recognition tool for damage detection [40][41][42][43][44], it is employed in this study to analyze the WPT features obtained from the response guided wave signals under different fatigue states.…”
Section: Statistical Multivariate Outlier Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus a statistical analysis is needed to consider these various uncertainties. Since outlier analysis have been demonstrated as a robust unsupervised learning pattern recognition tool for damage detection [40][41][42][43][44], it is employed in this study to analyze the WPT features obtained from the response guided wave signals under different fatigue states.…”
Section: Statistical Multivariate Outlier Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the more interesting approach to be used it depends on the specific problem and on the level of knowledge about the damage (detection, location, assessment, prediction) desired [8]. In this sense, a lot of methods can be used, such as linear and nonlinear Principal Component Analysis (PCA -NPCA) [9], Extreme Value Statistics (EVS) [10], Peaks Over Threshold (POT) [11], machine learning algorithms [12], neural network [13], Bayesian approaches [14], Mahalanobis distance [15,16], and others. In all these applications, the final objective of the methods used are the same, differentiate the uncertainties and variabilities of the damages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, systems' measured output can exhibit data variability from sources such as environmental or input load variation, aleatoric noise, changes in boundary conditions, variations in the fabrication processes (i.e., unit-to-unit variability), and others [21][22][23] . These variations all confound the damage detection process, suggesting the use of probabilistic tools [24][25][26] , regression models 5,27 , machine learning algorithms 28 , probabilistic model selection approaches [29][30][31][32] , outlier analysis 33,34 and novelty detection methods 5 . Considering the data variation problem is important in reducing the number of false alarms 10,35 , although there are situations where variability can mask positive detections as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%