2013
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty, attention, and challenges for developmental psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We cannot rule this out for older children who overcome their novelty biases (e.g., Horst & Samuelson, ), or for some children in this study who may have operated based on name‐knowledge. That said, our results are in line with other studies that show the pervasive influence of novelty in word learning (Mather, ; Mervis & Bertrand, ) in that the young vocabulary learners here chose the novel objects even when the task was to ignore them (see also control trials in Frank, Sugarman, Horowitz, Lewis, & Yurovsky, ). This challenges the idea that children are using novelty in a goal‐directed way to advance their linguistic knowledge (Horst et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We cannot rule this out for older children who overcome their novelty biases (e.g., Horst & Samuelson, ), or for some children in this study who may have operated based on name‐knowledge. That said, our results are in line with other studies that show the pervasive influence of novelty in word learning (Mather, ; Mervis & Bertrand, ) in that the young vocabulary learners here chose the novel objects even when the task was to ignore them (see also control trials in Frank, Sugarman, Horowitz, Lewis, & Yurovsky, ). This challenges the idea that children are using novelty in a goal‐directed way to advance their linguistic knowledge (Horst et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are apparently inconsistent with the findings of previous studies that reported novel (unusual) events can interrupt ongoing mental process, change the orientation of attention, and make delay in motor response even in newborns (Folstein, Van Petten, & Rose, 2008; Mather, 2013). However, it should be noted that in those studies, novel stimuli were not presented as distractors, the presentation location of novel or unusual stimuli was not far from the focus of attention, and the subjects were not requested to fix their initial position of their attention on a place that had a considerable distance from the attraction basin of distractors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the phenomenon of repetition suppression has been well documented in the adult brain (sometimes called fMRI adaptation; see review in Grill-Spector, Henson & Martin, 2006). Moreover, repetition suppression appears to mirror the well-known behavioral phenomenon in the developmental literature of habituation where infants exhibit decreased looking time to familiar stimuli over successive exposures (Mather, 2013;Turk-Browne, Scholl & Chun, 2008). Thus, we might expect that infants who are repeatedly exposed to the same stimulus during a learning task will show decreases in neural activity in regions of the brain involved in learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%