International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems ISSCS2013 2013
DOI: 10.1109/isscs.2013.6651225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel wide band digital differentiators and integrators using different optimization techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Best values of the optimal coefficients obtained for the proposed integrators and those reported by other algorithms in the literature have been tabulated in the Table II. Integrators proposed in this paper have been designed for the entire range of normalized Nyquist frequency, thus they are wideband integrators. A comparison based on total magnitude error and total phase error of different integrators reported here has been done in Table III TPZ [4] PSO [17] GA [18] SA [18] FP [18] MPZCO [20] 0.0887 for 2nd, 3rd and 4th orders, respectively, which are significantly less than that for other integrators reported in literature. This leads us to a conclusion that the proposed integrators accurately approximates the ideal response over a much wider range of frequency than the other reported integrators.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Best values of the optimal coefficients obtained for the proposed integrators and those reported by other algorithms in the literature have been tabulated in the Table II. Integrators proposed in this paper have been designed for the entire range of normalized Nyquist frequency, thus they are wideband integrators. A comparison based on total magnitude error and total phase error of different integrators reported here has been done in Table III TPZ [4] PSO [17] GA [18] SA [18] FP [18] MPZCO [20] 0.0887 for 2nd, 3rd and 4th orders, respectively, which are significantly less than that for other integrators reported in literature. This leads us to a conclusion that the proposed integrators accurately approximates the ideal response over a much wider range of frequency than the other reported integrators.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…MAME for SA, GA, and Fletcher‐Powell algorithm based DIs of order 2 are reported as −2.6, −1.0, and −4.1 dB, respectively, by Al‐Alaoui and Baydoun . Jain et al reported DI with MAME of −11.2 dB by using PZC and Minimax algorithm.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Al‐Alaoui and Baydoun reported MAMEs of −10.2, 0.6, and −10.0 dB for DIs of order 3 by using SA, GA, and Fletcher‐Powell algorithm, respectively. Jain et al reported the design of third‐order DI with MAME of −18.2 dB by using PZC and Minimax algorithm, whereas MPSO‐based DI with MAME of −21.3 dB was reported by Gupta et al The proposed HS‐based DI of order 3 achieves MAME of −31.7 dB.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalent approaches to design digital differentiator are based on different interpolation and system approximation based techniques [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and optimization based techniques [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The design of digital differentiator based on system approximation is a four-step process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%