Abstract:Background: AML M0 has dismal complete remission (CR) rates (<50% in most series) and poor long term survival with conventional combination chemotherapy (CT). Thus it is considered a candidate for allogenic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in first remission and also for other novel therapeutic approaches. There is increasing recognition of angiogenesis as a pathogenic and prognostic factor in AML. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose oral metronomic CT in patients with AML-M… Show more
“…This regimen has been reported by the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India 31,32 (G. Narula, personal communication). It includes a combination of oral etoposide, 6‐thioguanine (6‐TG), and prednisolone as follows: (a) etoposide at 50 mg/m 2 orally once a day for 21 days, if oral preparation is unavailable, replace with intravenous (i.v.)…”
Section: Treatment Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Patients in such settings may have increased TRM if standard chemotherapy is administered upfront. However, the evidence supporting a metronomic approach to upfront chemotherapy in children with AML is limited 31,32 . In addition, there is concern regarding the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs with the administration of low‐dose chemotherapy.…”
Section: Treatment Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence supporting a metronomic approach to upfront chemotherapy in children with AML is limited. 31,32 In addition, there is concern regarding the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs with the administration of low-dose chemotherapy. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that, in a level 2 setting, beginning treatment with inexpensive, low-intensity chemotherapy will result in reduced TRM and an overall improvement in survival.…”
“…It is recommended to administer at least one cycle of either of the two options for the prephase chemotherapy before the start of induction course 1. Up to three cycles of prephase chemotherapy may be administered, based on an assessment of the clinical condition and socioeconomic circumstances of the patient.Prephase chemotherapy: Option 1-PrET regimen (Recommendation 2 C)This regimen has been reported by the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India31,32 (G. Narula, personal communication). It includes a combination of oral etoposide, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), and prednisolone as follows: (a) etoposide at 50 mg/m 2 orally once a day for 21 days, if oral preparation is unavailable, replace with intravenous (i.v.)…”
In low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), limited resources, suboptimal risk stratification, and disproportionate patient‐to‐infrastructure ratio result in low survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A high incidence of relapse, inherent to the biology, renders management arduous. The challenge of treating AML in LMICs is of balancing the intensity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, which appears necessary for cure, with available supportive care, which influences treatment‐related mortality. The recommendations outlined in this paper are based on published evidence and expert opinion. The principle of this adapted protocol is to tailor treatment to available resources, reduce preventable toxic death, and direct limited resources toward those children who are most likely to be cured.
“…This regimen has been reported by the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India 31,32 (G. Narula, personal communication). It includes a combination of oral etoposide, 6‐thioguanine (6‐TG), and prednisolone as follows: (a) etoposide at 50 mg/m 2 orally once a day for 21 days, if oral preparation is unavailable, replace with intravenous (i.v.)…”
Section: Treatment Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Patients in such settings may have increased TRM if standard chemotherapy is administered upfront. However, the evidence supporting a metronomic approach to upfront chemotherapy in children with AML is limited 31,32 . In addition, there is concern regarding the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs with the administration of low‐dose chemotherapy.…”
Section: Treatment Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence supporting a metronomic approach to upfront chemotherapy in children with AML is limited. 31,32 In addition, there is concern regarding the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs with the administration of low-dose chemotherapy. Nevertheless, it is anticipated that, in a level 2 setting, beginning treatment with inexpensive, low-intensity chemotherapy will result in reduced TRM and an overall improvement in survival.…”
“…It is recommended to administer at least one cycle of either of the two options for the prephase chemotherapy before the start of induction course 1. Up to three cycles of prephase chemotherapy may be administered, based on an assessment of the clinical condition and socioeconomic circumstances of the patient.Prephase chemotherapy: Option 1-PrET regimen (Recommendation 2 C)This regimen has been reported by the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India31,32 (G. Narula, personal communication). It includes a combination of oral etoposide, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), and prednisolone as follows: (a) etoposide at 50 mg/m 2 orally once a day for 21 days, if oral preparation is unavailable, replace with intravenous (i.v.)…”
In low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), limited resources, suboptimal risk stratification, and disproportionate patient‐to‐infrastructure ratio result in low survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A high incidence of relapse, inherent to the biology, renders management arduous. The challenge of treating AML in LMICs is of balancing the intensity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, which appears necessary for cure, with available supportive care, which influences treatment‐related mortality. The recommendations outlined in this paper are based on published evidence and expert opinion. The principle of this adapted protocol is to tailor treatment to available resources, reduce preventable toxic death, and direct limited resources toward those children who are most likely to be cured.
“…However, the main mechanism of the regimen in treating hematologic malignancies including AML is assumed to be the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis (Padró et al, 2000). Few observational studies and one case report had revealed favorable survival outcome of using metronomic chemotherapy in AML patients (Banavali et al, 2005;Tandon et al, 2013;Kapoor et al, 2016). To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized controlled trial to directly examine the efficacy and safety outcomes of metronomic chemotherapy in unfit AML patients.…”
Background: Management of unfit AML patients is a therapeutic challenge. Most hematologists tend to avoid aggressive treatment leaving patients with a choice of best supportive care. We hypothesized that metronomic chemotherapy could be an alternative treatment for unfit AML patients. Methods: A multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in seven university-affiliated hospitals in Thailand. Unfit AML patients were recruited and followed up from December 2014 to December 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either metronomic chemotherapy or palliative hydroxyurea. Overall survival rates were compared using Cox's proportional hazard survival analysis. Results: A total of 81 eligible patients were randomly allocated and included for ITT analysis. The OS rate was higher in group receiving metronomic chemotherapy than in group receiving palliative treatment at 6 and 12 months with borderline significance (6 months HR 0.60; 95%CI 0.36, 1.02; p-value 0.060; 12 months: HR 0.66; 95%CI 0.41, 1.08; p-value 0.097). Conclusion: Metronomic chemotherapy could prolong survival time of unfit AML patients, especially in the first 12 months after diagnosis without increasing treatment-associated adverse events.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults differs biologically and clinically from that in younger patients and is characterized by adverse chromosomal abnormalities, stronger intrinsic resistance, and lower tolerance to chemotherapy. In patients over age 60 with AML, cure rates are under 10% despite intensive chemotherapy, and most of them die within a year of diagnosis. Over the last decade, metronomic chemotherapy has emerged as a potential strategy to control advanced/refractory cancer. Here, we report a case of a 68-year-old gentleman having AML with high-risk cytogenetic features, who achieved complete remission on our oral metronomic PrET (PrET: Prednisolone, etoposide, thioguanine) protocol on an outpatient basis. He was later treated with standard high-dose (HD) cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) consolidation followed by maintenance with etoposide, thioguanine, and sodium valproate. Presently, the patient is nearly 35 months since diagnosis and 21 months off treatment. This case report and review highlights that the combination of oral low-intensity metronomic therapy, followed by standard HD consolidation therapy and metronomic maintenance therapy may be well tolerated by elderly patients especially with less proliferative, high (cytogenetic)-risk AML who are otherwise deemed to be unfit for intensive intravenous induction chemotherapy regimens. References for this review were identified through searches of Pubmed for recent publications on the subject as well as searches of the files of the authors themselves. The final list was generated on the basis of originality and relevance to this review.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.