2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel techniques to understand consumer responses towards food products: A review with a focus on meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were further processed using machine learning models developed using Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm with high accuracy (R = 0.85) [23] to obtain HR, SP, and DP. The biometrics presented in this paper do not have a medical grade but are accurate enough to compare differences and find changes between participants [23,25,31,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Video Acquisition and Facial Expressions Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were further processed using machine learning models developed using Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm with high accuracy (R = 0.85) [23] to obtain HR, SP, and DP. The biometrics presented in this paper do not have a medical grade but are accurate enough to compare differences and find changes between participants [23,25,31,[33][34][35].…”
Section: Video Acquisition and Facial Expressions Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, previous studies have reported that sensory characteristics of meat are affected by both ante-mortem (feeding, management, and transport previous to slaughter) and post-mortem (ageing conditions (time and temperature), packaging, and cooking) factors, leading to significant variability [15][16][17]. In order to understand consumer responses, physiological and psychological factors have to be taken into account, something that represents a complex issue [18]. To overcome this, a descriptive sensory analysis of trained panelists can provide objective information on flavor, taste, and texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An acceptance test with hedonic scale was used for the sensorial evaluation, using a scale of 9 points (9 = like extremely, 5 = neither like nor dislike, and 1 = dislike extremely), commonly used for meat evaluation (Torrico et al, 2018). The intention to purchase was also estimated, with a scale of 5 points (5: would certainly buy; 3: maybe would buy; 1: would certainly not buy), to assess consumers' intent in relation to the product (Guimarães et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%