2010
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2010.2044606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel System Inversion Algorithm With Application to Oversampled Perfect Reconstruction Filter Banks

Abstract: We derive a novel algorithm for linear (discrete-time) system inversion with decision delay and frequency weighted 2 norm criterion. Complexity of the algorithm grows only linearly with the decision delay. The algorithm also applies to certain singular cases where optimal inverses may be nonunique. In that case, the set of optimal inverses is parametrized. A Scilab implementation of the algorithm is provided. Applications in oversampled perfect reconstruction filter banks are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the causal minimum-norm right-inverse of GH with latency time L, P zf := argmin{ P 2 2 : P ∈ RH p×q ∞ , GHP = z −L I}, is well-defined [7]. Then, the precoder Popt in Theorem 2 converges towards √ Etr P zf Power of the scaled receiver input for σ 2 η → 0 : Assume that the minimum-norm right-inverse P zf from the previous subsection is well-defined, G is square and we employ Popt and αopt.…”
Section: Iv-b Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that the causal minimum-norm right-inverse of GH with latency time L, P zf := argmin{ P 2 2 : P ∈ RH p×q ∞ , GHP = z −L I}, is well-defined [7]. Then, the precoder Popt in Theorem 2 converges towards √ Etr P zf Power of the scaled receiver input for σ 2 η → 0 : Assume that the minimum-norm right-inverse P zf from the previous subsection is well-defined, G is square and we employ Popt and αopt.…”
Section: Iv-b Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 0.4208−0.4208z −0.1584−z ] T . Algorithm 2 in [8] gives us the optimal synthesis filter bank for the decision delay L = 2, R(z) ≈ [ p1 (z) q(z) , p2(z) q(z) , p1(−z) q(z) ], where p 1 (z) := −0.005 − 0.006z + 0.189z 2 + 0.219z 3 + 0.453z 4 + 0.476z 5 + 0.096z 6 , p 2 (z) := −0.003 + 0.115z 2 + 0.070z 4 − 0.329z 6 , and q(z) := 0.028z 2 + 0.396z 4 + z 6 . The quantizer used is v q = argminṽ q ∈{−1,0,1} 3×1 ṽ q − v 2 F .…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, to those non-minimum phase systems with zero feedthrough matix (D) and those systems having special disturbance dynamics. The restrictive condition of requiring zero feed-through matrix appears in most works that are related to the input reconstruction problem [10]. Flouquet and his colleagues [11] have proposed a sliding mode observer for the input recon!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%