2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-018-7052-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel system for simultaneously measuring the thickness and refractive index of a transparent plate with two optical paths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate the viability of the technique by measuring the position of the anterior and posterior reflections from air-glass and glass-air interfaces of a glass slab and ultimately obtaining the thickness of the sample. The resulting setup performed satisfactorily and provides a very simple, low cost solution to the thickness measurement of transparent plate and can be custom designed to accommodate a wide range of thickness from << 1 mm to several millimetres as opposed to other techniques that can be applied to either smaller values, the case of ellipsometry, or millimetre-sized values, triangulation methods [9]. We found this system particularly suitable for use in off-line quality control.…”
Section: Commonly Thementioning
confidence: 93%
“…We demonstrate the viability of the technique by measuring the position of the anterior and posterior reflections from air-glass and glass-air interfaces of a glass slab and ultimately obtaining the thickness of the sample. The resulting setup performed satisfactorily and provides a very simple, low cost solution to the thickness measurement of transparent plate and can be custom designed to accommodate a wide range of thickness from << 1 mm to several millimetres as opposed to other techniques that can be applied to either smaller values, the case of ellipsometry, or millimetre-sized values, triangulation methods [9]. We found this system particularly suitable for use in off-line quality control.…”
Section: Commonly Thementioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, since the range and accuracy of refractive index measurement are generally limited by the conditions required by the test method itself, there are some drawbacks in the currently commonly used measurement methods. The triangulation methods are limited by the spatial resolution of the beam, for example, the minimum deflection angle method, which requires high accuracy of the test prisms and is difficult to process [4]. The differential confocal methods [5,6], which needs to repeatedly search for the differential confocal method in the measurement process needs to repeatedly look for the position of the focusing spot and accurate alignment, measurement of cumbersome cycle time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially when using an optical coherence tomography system, it will affect the contrast of the image and the subsequent calculation of tissue thickness [22][23][24]. As a result, there are various measurement techniques proposed over the last decade for the simultaneous measurement of the refractive index and thickness of samples [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is not any existing method to simultaneously measure the thickness and refractive index for each layer of multilayered samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%