2015
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of NOP Receptor Agonist 8-[(1S,3aS)-2,3,3a,4,5,6-Hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl]-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-4-one (Ro 64-6198)

Abstract: The nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) receptor is a widely expressed GPCR involved in the modulation of pain, anxiety, and motor behaviors. Dissecting the functional properties of this receptor is limited by the lack of systemically active ligands that are brain permeant. The small molecule NOP receptor-selective, full agonist 8-[(1S,3aS)-2,3,3a,4,5,6-hexahydro- 1H-phenalen-1-yl]-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decan-4-one (Ro 64-6198) hydrochloride is an active, brain penetrant ligand, but its diffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the ligand efficacy at G protein and β-arrestin 2 suggests that Ro 65-6570 behaved as a G protein-biased agonist. This seems to be the rule for NOP (Malfacini et al, 2015; Chang et al, 2015b, 2015a) and opioid (Molinari et al, 2010) nonpeptide agonists. AT-090 and AT-127 seem to be the exception to this rule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Comparing the ligand efficacy at G protein and β-arrestin 2 suggests that Ro 65-6570 behaved as a G protein-biased agonist. This seems to be the rule for NOP (Malfacini et al, 2015; Chang et al, 2015b, 2015a) and opioid (Molinari et al, 2010) nonpeptide agonists. AT-090 and AT-127 seem to be the exception to this rule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…N/OFQ, Ro64‐6198 and Ro65‐6570 have no or only a weak bias for G‐protein signaling (Chang et al . ; Rizzi et al . ); thus, the lack of β‐arrestin2 signaling is an attractive hypothesis to explain the better tolerability of cebranopadol as compared to other NOP receptor agonists and may also give first hints regarding a possible functional relevance of biased signaling at the NOP receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies suggest that the systemic injection of Ro 64-6198 does not modify nociceptive pain transmission in rodents, as demonstrated in the tail flick, tail immersion, tactile or cold water stimulation, and foot shock test Obara et al, 2005;Varty et al, 2005;Reiss et al, 2008). However an exception to this rule is the mouse hot plate test where systemic Ro 64-6198 produced modest antinociceptive effects (Reiss et al, 2008;Chang et al, 2015a). These effects were reproduced in NOP(+/+) but not NOP(2/2) mice.…”
Section: B Nociceptin/orphanin Fq Unrelated Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%