2007
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Structural Determinants on SIRPα that Mediate Binding to CD47

Abstract: Signal regulatory proteins (SIRP-α, -β, and -γ) are important regulators of several innate immune functions that include leukocyte migration. Membrane distal (D1) domains of SIRPα and SIRPγ, but not SIRPβ, mediate binding to a cellular ligand termed CD47. Because the extracellular domains of all SIRPs are highly homologous, we hypothesized that some of the 16 residues unique to SIRPα.D1 mediate binding to CD47. By site-directed mutagenesis, we determined that SIRPα binding to CD47 is independent of N-glycosyla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected from the sequence similarity of the SIRPα and SIRPβ there is little difference in the overall structures of the domains but subtle differences in the loops were found with evidence for considerable mobility in these [17]. Sequence analysis and mutagenesis have failed to provide a simple explanation for the failure of SIRPβ to bind to CD47 [14,15,[17][18][19] but the structures suggest that this failure is due to subtle differences in the loops and involving indirect changes and not solely contact residues [17].…”
Section: The Structure Of Sirpα and Its Ligand Cd47mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As expected from the sequence similarity of the SIRPα and SIRPβ there is little difference in the overall structures of the domains but subtle differences in the loops were found with evidence for considerable mobility in these [17]. Sequence analysis and mutagenesis have failed to provide a simple explanation for the failure of SIRPβ to bind to CD47 [14,15,[17][18][19] but the structures suggest that this failure is due to subtle differences in the loops and involving indirect changes and not solely contact residues [17].…”
Section: The Structure Of Sirpα and Its Ligand Cd47mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Rabbit polyclonal antiserum against recombinant SIRP␣ ectodomain was produced by Covance Research Products. Monoclonal antibodies against SIRP␣ D1 (SAF17.2) and SIRP␣ D3 (SAF4.2) have been described previously (9). LPS from Salmonella minnesota R595 was obtained from List Biological Laboratories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forward and reverse end primers were designed with HindIII and BamHI sites. DNA constructs encoding various ectodomains of SIRP␣ tagged with His 10 (SIRP␣-His) were cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) as described previously (9). All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbit polyclonal antiserum against recombinant SIRP␣ ectodomain as well as murine monoclonal antibodies against SIRP␣D1 (SAF17.2) or SIRP␣D3 (SAF4.2) were generated as described previously (28). A hybridoma that secretes a murine monoclonal antibody against Myc (9E10) was obtained from ATCC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little is known about the contributions of the membrane-proximal immunoglobulin domains of SIRP␣. Previously published analyses of protein sequences indicated that proximal domains contained IgC motifs and are highly homologous among members of the SIRP family (6,(27)(28)(29)(30). Given that many known IgC domains associate with other IgC domains, others have speculated that SIRP␣ may form dimers and higher order structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%