Novel strategy to stop cigarette smoking by surgical patients: Pilot study in a preadmission clinic

Haile, Melanie; Wiggers, John; Spigelman, Allan D.; Knight, Jenny; Considine, Robyn; Moore, Kristin J.

doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02520.x

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The 26 papers 99,103, included in the review used the following designs: four non-randomised trials, 103,162,166,175 18 cross-sectional, 99,[158][159][160][163][164][165][167][168][169][170]173,174,176,[178][179][180][181] two cohort, 161,177 and two qualitative studies. 171,172 Two studies 99,177 described electronic aids with single or multiple generic components, 18 studies 103,[158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171]176,180,181 described el...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…171,172 Two studies 99,177 described electronic aids with single or multiple generic components, 18 studies 103,[158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171]176,180,181 described electronic aids with a single tailored component (with or without a generic component) and six studies [171][172][173][174][175]178 described interventions that had multiple tailored components (with or without generic components). Thus, the balance of studies in the supplementary review is similar to the effectiveness review in that the majority involved interventions with a single tailored component.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Chen

Madan²,

Welton³

et al. 2012

Health Technol Assess

137

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this title, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable DVD is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA journal series issues cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our despatch agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per issue and for the rest of the world £3 per issue. How to order:-fax (with credit card details) -post (with credit card details or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you to either print out your order or download a blank order form. Contact details are as follows:Synergie UK (HTA Department) Digital House, The Loddon Centre Wade Road Basingstoke Hants RG24 8QW Email: orders@hta.ac.uk Tel: 0845 812 4000 -ask for 'HTA Payment Services' (out-of-hours answer-phone service) Fax: 0845 812 4001 -put 'HTA Order' on the fax header Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to University of Southampton and drawn on a bank with a UK address.Paying by credit card You can order using your credit card by phone, fax or post. SubscriptionsNHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 40-50 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £400 per volume (addresses within the UK) and £600 per volume (addresses outside the UK). Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can be purchased only for the current or forthcoming volume.How do I get a copy of HTA on DVD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd/index.shtml). HTA on DVD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NIHR Health Technology Assessment programmeThe Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care. The research findings from the HTA programme directly influence decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC). HTA findings also help to improve the quality of clinical practice in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' . The HTA programme is needs led in that it fills gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. There are three routes to the start of project...

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Chen

Madan²,

Welton³

et al. 2012

Health Technol Assess

137

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patients who were non-dependent (£ 10 cigarettes per day) [9] were provided with the following intervention components. First, based on previous evidence that computers can be successfully used for the provision of preventive care in hospital settings including in preoperative clinics [6,10] patients received tailored counselling on cessation delivered by computer. The counselling was interactive and incorporated problem solving and practical skills training, and encouraged intra-and extra-treatment social support [11].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The studies which do exist have been uncontrolled [6], quasi-experimental [7] or have not randomly allocated participants [8]. Given the deficits of previous studies and the potential for short-and long-term health gains, more rigorous evaluation of such interventions in this setting is required.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Given the deficits of previous studies and the potential for short-and long-term health gains, more rigorous evaluation of such interventions in this setting is required. This trial is part of an ongoing programme of work aimed at improving the provision of care directed at smoking cessation in a pre-operative clinic [6]. The aim of the current trial was to assess the efficacy of intervention in increasing the smoking abstinence rates in surgical patients before admission, and 3 months after attendance at a pre-operative clinic.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A programme for reducing smoking in pre‐operative surgical patients: randomised controlled trial*

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryWe assessed the efficacy of a comprehensive programme for stopping smoking in 210 smokers scheduled for surgery, before admission and 3 months after attending a pre-operative clinic. Participants were randomly allocated to receive an intervention incorporating nicotine replacement therapy for patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day ('dependent smokers'), or to a control group to receive usual care. Dependent smokers allocated to the intervention group were more likely to report abstinence before surgery than those allocated to receive usual-care (63 (73%) vs. 29 (56%), respectively; OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.0-4.8)), and 3 months after attendance (16 (18%) vs. 3 (5%), respectively; OR = 3.9 (95% CI 1.0-21.7).

show abstract

Efficacy of a smoking‐cessation intervention for elective‐surgical patients

Ratner

Johnson

Richardson

et al. 2004

Research in Nursing & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We tested an intervention to help smokers abstain (fast) from smoking before surgery, maintain abstinence postoperatively, and achieve long-term cessation. A randomized experiment included 237 patients admitted for presurgical assessment who smoked. The intervention included counseling and nicotine replacement therapy. Treatment group participants (73.0%) were more likely to fast than were controls (53.0%): chi(2)(1, N = 228) = 8.89, p =.003, and more likely to be abstinent 6 months after surgery (31.2% vs. 20.2%). There was no significant difference in the abstinence rates at 12 months after surgery, chi(2)(1, N = 169) <.001, p = 1.00. Encouraging patients to fast from smoking before surgery and postoperative support are efficacious ways to reduce preoperative and immediate post-operative tobacco use.

show abstract

Novel strategy to stop cigarette smoking by surgical patients: Pilot study in a preadmission clinic

Abstract: An interactive computerized smoking cessation programme is an acceptable and feasible method of routinely encouraging surgical preadmission clinic patients to stop or reduce their smoking. Further development and testing of the efficacy of this approach is required.

Cited by 16 publications

References 34 publications

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

A programme for reducing smoking in pre‐operative surgical patients: randomised controlled trial*

Efficacy of a smoking‐cessation intervention for elective‐surgical patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About