2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel sensitive immunosensor for the selective detection of Engrailed 2 urinary prostate cancer biomarker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitting the measurement data according to Hill Model, the dissociation constant is đŸ 𝑑 = 4.605 × 10 −10 mg/mL. The value range of the reported đŸ 𝑑 is very low, indicating a solid attachment in this recognition system, which is expected for antibody-antigen immunoreaction [74].…”
Section: Immunosensor Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Fitting the measurement data according to Hill Model, the dissociation constant is đŸ 𝑑 = 4.605 × 10 −10 mg/mL. The value range of the reported đŸ 𝑑 is very low, indicating a solid attachment in this recognition system, which is expected for antibody-antigen immunoreaction [74].…”
Section: Immunosensor Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The gold electrodes underwent initial cleaning using a polishing process outlined in our previous publication [54]. Two different thiolated single-stranded DNA probes with 40 bases, namely, Probe 1 and Probe 2, were designed to investigate the influence of hy bridization location on the detection signal and ensure the specific and selective recogni tion of PCA3.…”
Section: Genosensor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the affinity between PCA3 and Probe 2, the dissociation constant (K d ) was estimated using a combined power law and Hill model, as outlined in Equation (3). The power law component models non-specific adsorption, while the Hill equation component accounts for specific recognition processes [54,70]. This approach provides a comprehensive analysis of both non-specific and specific interactions between PCA3 and the probe:…”
Section: Specificity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that EN1 is overexpressed in tumors and functions as an oncogene 3–6 . High‐expression levels of EN2 have been found in many solid cancers, including prostate, bladder, colorectal, and breast cancer 7–11 . There is accumulating evidence that EN2 is a potential oncogene; however, the exact mechanism underlying its biological function remains to be fully elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%