2005
DOI: 10.1021/jo0477594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Ruthenium-Based Metathesis Catalysts Containing Electron- Withdrawing Ligands:  Synthesis, Immobilization, and Reactivity

Abstract: The syntheses and reactivity of seven different ruthenium-based metathesis catalysts are described. Ru(CF3COO)2(PCy3)(=CH-2-(2-PrO)C6H4) (1), Ru(CF3COO)2(1,3-dimesityldihydroimidazolin-2-ylidene)(=CH-2-(2-PrO)C6H4) (2), and Ru(CF3COO)2(PCy(3))(1,3-dimesityldihydroimidazolin-2-ylidene)(=CHC6H5) (3) were prepared via chlorine exchange by reacting RuCl2(PCy3)2(=CH-2-(2-PrO)C6H4), RuCl2(1,3-dimesityldihydroimidazolin-2-ylidene)(=CH-2-(2-PrO)C6H4), and RuCl2(PCy3)(1,3-dimesityldihydroimidazolin-2-ylidene)(=CHC6H5),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[46] Immobilized Grubbs-Hoveyda or Grubbs-Hoveyda-Grela catalysts can also be prepared on monoliths based on PS-DVB polymers (10e-g). [45,[47][48][49] These catalysts display good performances in RCM. Noteworthy, Ru leaching is very low, and product contamination by Ru is extremely low, i.e., < 100 ppb/ g. Additionally, this property makes them suitable to be used in a continuous flow reactor, where high TON can be achieved (up to several thousands), but deactivation remains a problem, and their performances are still somewhat lower than those of their homogeneous analogues.…”
Section: Immobilization By Exchanging Chloride Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[46] Immobilized Grubbs-Hoveyda or Grubbs-Hoveyda-Grela catalysts can also be prepared on monoliths based on PS-DVB polymers (10e-g). [45,[47][48][49] These catalysts display good performances in RCM. Noteworthy, Ru leaching is very low, and product contamination by Ru is extremely low, i.e., < 100 ppb/ g. Additionally, this property makes them suitable to be used in a continuous flow reactor, where high TON can be achieved (up to several thousands), but deactivation remains a problem, and their performances are still somewhat lower than those of their homogeneous analogues.…”
Section: Immobilization By Exchanging Chloride Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[44] In a similar way, using the hydroxymethylfunctionalized Merrifield resins, the immobilized Grubbs II catalyst can be prepared (10b). [45] A Grubbs II catalyst can also be supported on monoliths (10c) or silica (10d). [46] Immobilized Grubbs-Hoveyda or Grubbs-Hoveyda-Grela catalysts can also be prepared on monoliths based on PS-DVB polymers (10e-g).…”
Section: Immobilization By Exchanging Chloride Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] This catalyst showed excellent stability towards air and moisture and could be recycled several times. Various other efforts have been directed towards the modification of the Grubbs catalysts, such as the introduction of bidentate Schiff base ligands, [11,12] substituted acetic acid groups, [13][14][15][16] different alkoxides, [17,18] halides, [19] pyridines, [18,20,21] phenoxides, [22,23] less electron-donating phosphines, [24] several pyridinecarboxylates [25] and indenylidene ligand substituting benzylidene. [26,27] Recently, our group has reported new robust ruthenium-indenylidene complexes bearing a saturated N-heterocyclic carbene ligand, showing both high activity and increased stability with an excellent application profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was closely followed in activity by 85 (30 8C, 55 min, 80 %); the pseudohalide catalyst 86 was the least active (30 8C, 210 min, 27 %). [68] Catalyst 85 was less active in the RCM of 11 in micellar solutions (room temperature, 137 min, 27 %), which indicates that the catalyst and reactant occupy unfavorable positions. It was proposed that the active site of catalyst 85 is in the hydrophilic part of the micelle, whereas the lipophilic diene is localized mostly in the core of the micelle (Scheme 24).…”
Section: Application In Heterogeneous Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 97%