2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-014-0143-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel RP1 mutations and a recurrent BBS1variant explain the co-existence of two distinct retinal phenotypes in the same pedigree

Abstract: BackgroundMolecular diagnosis of Inherited Retinal Dystrophies (IRD) has long been challenging due to the extensive clinical and genetic heterogeneity present in this group of disorders. Here, we describe the clinical application of an integrated next-generation sequencing approach to determine the underlying genetic defects in a Spanish family with a provisional clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa (arRP).ResultsExome sequencing of the index patient resulted in the identification of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In addition, other previously reported variants, such as p.D202E, p.I1988Nfs*3, and p.I2061Sfs*12, could also be predicted to be mild or hypomorphic variants considering their location; however, they have been associated with arRP, although the clinical phenotype has not been described in detail. [23][24][25] The explanation for this clinical heterogeneity remains to be elucidated, but might be explained by additional (genetic-) modifying factors, the presence of a structural variant or a variant in the non-coding regions of RP1, pathogenic variants in another RP gene, or inaccurate phenotyping, the latter of which should be considered particularly in advanced RP and CRD, in which the distinction can be difficult and depends on patients' self-reported disease course. A potential genetic modifier for RP1-associated disease may be RP1L1, because these proteins have synergistic roles in the photoreceptor axoneme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 In addition, other previously reported variants, such as p.D202E, p.I1988Nfs*3, and p.I2061Sfs*12, could also be predicted to be mild or hypomorphic variants considering their location; however, they have been associated with arRP, although the clinical phenotype has not been described in detail. [23][24][25] The explanation for this clinical heterogeneity remains to be elucidated, but might be explained by additional (genetic-) modifying factors, the presence of a structural variant or a variant in the non-coding regions of RP1, pathogenic variants in another RP gene, or inaccurate phenotyping, the latter of which should be considered particularly in advanced RP and CRD, in which the distinction can be difficult and depends on patients' self-reported disease course. A potential genetic modifier for RP1-associated disease may be RP1L1, because these proteins have synergistic roles in the photoreceptor axoneme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify causative mutations in the sequenced samples, we used our validated data analysis pipeline 29 with some modifications. Sequence reads were mapped against the human genome reference (hg19) using SureCall software (Agilent, version 2.1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Clinical diagnosis of ARRP was ascertained as described [Mendez-Vidal et al, 2014]. Individual II:1 underwent ophthalmogic examination including fundoscopy and electroretinography.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Patients And Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Library preparation, targeted sequencing on a 454 Roche GS Junior sequencer and data analysis were performed as described [Mendez-Vidal et al, 2014].…”
Section: Library Preparation and Gene Panel Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation