1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)95434-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel rearrangement of twisted 2,4-di-alkyl 2-trans-4-trans pentadienals: An approach to cyclopentenones based on molecular mechanical consideration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers specifically used 2Z,4E-isomer as a substrate in dichloromethane in the presence of strong Lewis acids as catalysts, while we used 2E,4E-isomer and only water without any catalyst. Similar cyclization was reported for the congested dienal with plural sterically bulky groups via a ketene intermediate as a special case [35]; however, non-substituted simple dienal 1a was used in our reaction.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The researchers specifically used 2Z,4E-isomer as a substrate in dichloromethane in the presence of strong Lewis acids as catalysts, while we used 2E,4E-isomer and only water without any catalyst. Similar cyclization was reported for the congested dienal with plural sterically bulky groups via a ketene intermediate as a special case [35]; however, non-substituted simple dienal 1a was used in our reaction.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The same year, the group of Ogawa reported the isomerization of conjugated all-trans-dienals 18 using concentrated hydrochloric acid in THF at 40 °C (Sch eme 4). 19 Consistent with the mechanism depicted in Scheme 1B, the authors stated that non-conjugated cyclopentenones 19 were the initially obtained products of these cycloisomerizations. Instead, if temperature was raised above 45 °C, a ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This barrier appears to be the result of an unfavorable 1,3‐allylic interaction between the two methyl groups in 13 that is not present in 12 . The strain imparted to the AlCl 3 ‐bound reactant by this interaction (see the distorted C‐C‐C angle, 132 °, in 13 , Figure 1; note also that the Me⋅⋅⋅Me distance is significantly greater for TS‐13 than for 13 ) is reduced as the transition‐state structure is reached 18. 19 Replacement of the γ‐methyl groups of 12 and 13 with hydrogen atoms reduces the energy difference (3.2 kcal mol −1 ) between the corresponding barriers for cyclization (compare to the 6.6 kcal mol −1 difference between 12 and 13 ), additionally demonstrating the importance of the 1,3‐allylic steric interaction 14c…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%