2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0833-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel QTLs for photoperiodic flowering revealed by using reciprocal backcross inbred lines from crosses between japonica rice cultivars

Abstract: The rice japonica cultivars Nipponbare and Koshihikari differ in heading date and response of heading to photoperiod (photoperiod sensitivity). Using simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, we conducted quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses for heading date in a set of reciprocal backcross inbred lines (BILs) from crosses between Nipponbare and Koshihikari. Under natural-day conditions, transgressive segregation in days to heading (DTH) toward both early and late headin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, biparental populations of Japanese rice cultivars have been used for genetic analysis of the natural variation in several agronomic traits, such as heading date (Fujino et al 2005, Matsubara et al 2008, culm length (Hori et al 2009), pre-harvest sprouting resistance (Hori et al 2010), eating quality (Kobayashi and Tomita 2008, Takeuchi et al 2008, Wada et al 2008) and grain quality (Kobayashi et al 2007, Tabata et al 2007). These studies have demonstrated that a relatively large allelic difference at a particular locus could be detected despite extremely low sequence diversity in Japanese cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, biparental populations of Japanese rice cultivars have been used for genetic analysis of the natural variation in several agronomic traits, such as heading date (Fujino et al 2005, Matsubara et al 2008, culm length (Hori et al 2009), pre-harvest sprouting resistance (Hori et al 2010), eating quality (Kobayashi and Tomita 2008, Takeuchi et al 2008, Wada et al 2008) and grain quality (Kobayashi et al 2007, Tabata et al 2007). These studies have demonstrated that a relatively large allelic difference at a particular locus could be detected despite extremely low sequence diversity in Japanese cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses have identified several unique QTLs for heading date (Matsubara et al 2008), culm length (Hori et al 2009), pre-harvest sprouting resistance (Hori et al 2010), and eating quality (Takeuchi et al 2008;Kobayashi and Tomita 2008;Wada et al 2008). The success of this approach implies that the use of a wide range of cross combinations might increase the opportunity to detect unique QTLs.…”
Section: Comparison With Qtl Clusters Identified In Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QTLs were called where their logarithm of the odds (LOD) values exceeded 2.0, and the proportion of phenotypic variation was estimated from the coefficient of determination (R 2 ). Parameter settings for the QTL mapping were as described by Matsubara (Matsubara et al, 2008). The QTL was named following the nomenclature recommended by McCouch and CGSNL (McCouch and CGSNL, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%