2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel preparation of carbon-TiO2 composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the characteristic peaks of GO cannot be observed in all XRD patterns because of the very small amount of GO incorporated in the composite . Whereas the Raman spectra of TiO 2 -rGO composite (Figure b) clearly showed the characteristic peaks of both anatase-TiO 2 and GO, in which the peaks at 145 (Eg(1)), 399 (B1g(1)), 637 (Eg(2)), and 516 cm –1 (A1g+B1g(2)) were attributed to the typical modes of anatase-TiO 2 , and the D-band and G-band of GO at 1349 and 1592 cm –1 shifted a little to 1356 and 1609 cm –1 in TiO 2 -rGO composite due to the interaction between TiO 2 and rGO . Moreover, the intensity ratio of D/G bonds increased a little from 0.86 to 0.88 in TiO 2 -rGO composites, indicating a decrease in the average size of the sp2 domains caused by the hydrothermal reduction. To clarify the transition of GO to rGO during the hydrothermal process, we compared the XRD patterns (Figure S4a) and FTIR spectra (Figure S4b) of pristine GO before and after the hydrothermal process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the characteristic peaks of GO cannot be observed in all XRD patterns because of the very small amount of GO incorporated in the composite . Whereas the Raman spectra of TiO 2 -rGO composite (Figure b) clearly showed the characteristic peaks of both anatase-TiO 2 and GO, in which the peaks at 145 (Eg(1)), 399 (B1g(1)), 637 (Eg(2)), and 516 cm –1 (A1g+B1g(2)) were attributed to the typical modes of anatase-TiO 2 , and the D-band and G-band of GO at 1349 and 1592 cm –1 shifted a little to 1356 and 1609 cm –1 in TiO 2 -rGO composite due to the interaction between TiO 2 and rGO . Moreover, the intensity ratio of D/G bonds increased a little from 0.86 to 0.88 in TiO 2 -rGO composites, indicating a decrease in the average size of the sp2 domains caused by the hydrothermal reduction. To clarify the transition of GO to rGO during the hydrothermal process, we compared the XRD patterns (Figure S4a) and FTIR spectra (Figure S4b) of pristine GO before and after the hydrothermal process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, it has been proved that amorphous carbon materials could be obtained by calcining carbon sources consisting of C, H and O. 37 , 38 Based on this, we believed that the organic surfactant (Pluronic L64) resulted in the formation of amorphous carbon after calcination.
Figure 4 ( A ) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) patterns and element contents of SLA, SLA-ZrP0.5 and SLA-ZrP0.7 samples; ( B ) split-fitting spectra of the Zr3d peaks in different groups.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Raman spectra of C–TiO 2 nanocomposites (Figure 1b) present the characteristic peaks of both anatase-TiO 2 and carbon, among which the peaks at 144 (E g(1) ), 393 (B 1g(1) ), 512 (A 1g + B 1g(2) ), and 633 cm –1 (E g(2) ) were attributed to the typical modes of anatase-TiO 2 , 5 and the D-band and G-band of carbon at 1321 and 1583 cm –1 shifted a little to 1334 and 1599 cm –1 in C–TiO 2 nanocomposites due to the interaction between TiO 2 and carbon. 39,44,45 In addition, the composition of the C–TiO 2 -2 and C−γ-Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 -2 nanocomposites was studied by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (Figures 1c and S1). The peaks showed that the C–TiO 2 -2 product was only composed of Ti, O, and C elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction peaks correspond to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), and (116) planes of the tetragonal phase of anatase TiO 2 (JCPDS 21-1272), but there are no peaks belonging to rutile phase; the diffraction peaks of carbon are not observed in the complex, which may be due to the low carbon content and relatively low diffraction intensity. The Raman spectra of C–TiO 2 nanocomposites (Figure b) present the characteristic peaks of both anatase-TiO 2 and carbon, among which the peaks at 144 (E g(1) ), 393 (B 1g(1) ), 512 (A 1g + B 1g(2) ), and 633 cm –1 (E g(2) ) were attributed to the typical modes of anatase-TiO 2 , and the D-band and G-band of carbon at 1321 and 1583 cm –1 shifted a little to 1334 and 1599 cm –1 in C–TiO 2 nanocomposites due to the interaction between TiO 2 and carbon. ,, In addition, the composition of the C–TiO 2 -2 and C−γ-Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 -2 nanocomposites was studied by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (Figures c and S1). The peaks showed that the C–TiO 2 -2 product was only composed of Ti, O, and C elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%