2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel polymeric micelles for drug delivery: Material characterization and formulation screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of its poor solubility in water, the further application of DA has been restricted (Huang et al, 2016 ). Considering these drawbacks, a serial of micro/nanoparticle delivery-systems were developed to solve these problems (Park et al, 2012 ; Robinson et al, 2016 ; Janas et al, 2016 ). The objective of this study is to use a biodegradable polymer monomethyl poly(ethylene glycol)−poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (MPEG-PCL) as the delivery vehicle for DA to achieve the synergism between inhibiting lipid peroxidation and inflammation effects of the hydrophobic loaded drugs and sealing the damaged axonal membranes of the amphipathic delivery vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of its poor solubility in water, the further application of DA has been restricted (Huang et al, 2016 ). Considering these drawbacks, a serial of micro/nanoparticle delivery-systems were developed to solve these problems (Park et al, 2012 ; Robinson et al, 2016 ; Janas et al, 2016 ). The objective of this study is to use a biodegradable polymer monomethyl poly(ethylene glycol)−poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (MPEG-PCL) as the delivery vehicle for DA to achieve the synergism between inhibiting lipid peroxidation and inflammation effects of the hydrophobic loaded drugs and sealing the damaged axonal membranes of the amphipathic delivery vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to our systems, other polymeric micelles recently used for Dex encapsulation exhibited lower loading capacities. A loading capacity in the range 0.5–3% was observed for Dex-loaded micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as a hydrophilic part, and poly(butyl methacrylate) 53 , poly(D,L-lactide) 54 , poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) 55 , 56 and poly(propylene glycol) 57 , respectively, as a hydrophobic core. Slightly higher loading capacities (from 7 to 12%) were reported for PEG-PCL micelles loaded with Dex-acetate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the highest achieved loading capacity is relatively low comparing to the POx and POzi formulations comprising CUR or PTX discussed above, it is still higher than DEXA formulations based on other block copolymers. [ 161–164 ] Interestingly, also other POx, including pBuOx and pPrOx containing block copolymers with lower DP and different ratio of blocks exhibited lower loading capacities toward DEXA [ 99 ] These effects of copolymer composition require deeper examination. The release of DEXA from the micelles was accelerated by using ultrasound (US) as an external stimulus, however, the study was performed only in vitro using dialysis cups.…”
Section: Poly(2‐oxazoline)‐based Nanoformulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%