Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Advances in Molecular Plant Nematology 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9080-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Plant Defences Against Nematodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Screening for GUS expression after M.incognita infection showed that expression of many genes normally expressed at different developmental times or in different cell types are upregulated in giant cells. These results in Arabidopsis are consistent with previous observations in tomato (Bird and Wilson, 1994) and confirm the complex morphological and physiological changes in cells during their modification into nematode feeding site (Jones, 1981; reviewed in Atkinson et al ., 1994; Niebel et al ., 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Screening for GUS expression after M.incognita infection showed that expression of many genes normally expressed at different developmental times or in different cell types are upregulated in giant cells. These results in Arabidopsis are consistent with previous observations in tomato (Bird and Wilson, 1994) and confirm the complex morphological and physiological changes in cells during their modification into nematode feeding site (Jones, 1981; reviewed in Atkinson et al ., 1994; Niebel et al ., 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification and cloning of nematode‐responsive plant genes and promoters constitute a major challenge for our knowledge and understanding of the plant–nematode interaction and the development of novel approaches to engineering plant resistance (reviewed in Gheysen et al ., 1996; Grundler, 1996). Nematode‐responsive promoters may be used to express anti‐nematode proteins (Atkinson et al ., 1994), phytotoxic proteins or essential genes (anti‐sense approaches) that interfere with the development of feeding cells (Sijmons, 1993). Furthermore, determining how a nematode selects particular root cells and modifies them to serve as a feeding site will enhance our understanding of normal cell development and may serve in identifying genes that regulate aspects of cell division.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continued searches of germplasm are needed to identify new sources of resistance. Artificially engineered resistance based on antisense technology or expression of anti-nematode proteins may be an additional source of resistance (3,53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield loss due to nematode infection can be difficult to quantify as a lack of clear symptoms often allows the presence of nematodes to remain undetected by growers until the infestation is severe (Atkinson, 1996). However, it is estimated that in EU countries the combined annual yield loss to sugar beet cyst nematode is $95 million (Müller, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%