Novel Physical Fitness Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Individual Health Promotion

Abstract

Physical fitness level plays a significant role in health promotion. Cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular endurance, muscle power, and flexibility are the four key indicators of physical fitness level, listed as one of the important fields of preventive medicine. Some studies targeted at students, based on statistical inference, have put forward a set of physical fitness evaluation methods to see whether they have reached the level of healthy physical fitness. Testing and monitoring of individual physical fitness takes up little time and requires a small sample dataset; this paper hence proposed an evaluation and analysis model that suits individual physical fitness by means of a fuzzy evaluation method suitable for evaluating small sample datasets. This paper developed the evaluation model based on the upper confidence limit of the physical fitness evaluation index so that it could reduce the risk of misjudgment caused by sampling error. At the same time, a simple and easy-to-use fuzzy evaluation form was developed as an evaluation interface, which can present the whole picture of all evaluation indicators as well as have good and convenient management performance. Accordingly, it can help every individual simultaneously monitor multiple physical fitness indicators to ensure that each physical fitness index can meet the requirement of healthy physical fitness.

An Empirical Study on the Influence of College Students’ Physical Fitness on the Level of Public Health

“…(4) Universities should strengthen the publicity of physical fitness, encourage college students to pay attention to public health, hire famous domestic experts to give lectures, and increase the guidance of physical fitness. (5) The implementation of physical fitness can improve the level of public health, so it is necessary to strengthen college students' physical fitness. This study also has some limitations, mainly reflected in the collection of related data loss, data pretreat-ment not enough, and an increase in the error of research results.…”

“…According to the survey in Figure 1 , the average demand for physical fitness changes by 32%, and the actual demand for public health to affect the value is rising, and the difference between them is increasing year by year [ 5 ]. In 2020 and 2020, the demand for improving the impact value of public health level is reasonable, and the demand for physical fitness fluctuates greatly in 2018 and 2019, which further shows that physical fitness cannot meet the impact value demand of public health level, and further research will be carried out in the future.…”