2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Pd–Cr electrocatalyst with low Pd content for coal electrolysis for hydrogen production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, by the calcination process (temperature and time) the shape of the particles transforms from a triangle and square shape to a spherical shape. Ping et al, [19] have prepared the PdCr catalysts in different atomic ratios on coal surfaces for hydrogen production. It was reported that a smaller particle size of Pd (4.66 nm) formed by the reduction of PdCr on carbon substrate [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, by the calcination process (temperature and time) the shape of the particles transforms from a triangle and square shape to a spherical shape. Ping et al, [19] have prepared the PdCr catalysts in different atomic ratios on coal surfaces for hydrogen production. It was reported that a smaller particle size of Pd (4.66 nm) formed by the reduction of PdCr on carbon substrate [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties the Pd-based binary alloys could be used as alternative metal. There are many studies about using the Pdbased materials nanocatalysts for the ORR [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. To address this concern, the Pd nanoparticles with numerous morphologies such as icosahedron, sphere, spindle, cube, and rod are efficiently promoted for the Suzuki coupling reaction as well as the reduction of Cr(VI) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of energy consumption, the electrolysis of coal is preferred to water electrolysis; this is because 56.7 kcal of electrical energy and a reversible potential of 1.23 V are required to produce 1 mol of hydrogen in water electrolysis, whereas coal electrolysis only requires 9.5 kcal and 0.21 V, respectively. , This is achieved because the oxygen evolution reaction, which has high overpotential, is replaced with coal oxidation at the anode . Despite this advantage, the production of hydrogen through the electrolysis of coal slurry is retarded by poor reaction kinetics, low current density, and low degradation degree of coal. , This makes the process uneconomical and the technology unavailable for commercialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%