1995
DOI: 10.1172/jci117714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel pattern of P53 mutation in breast cancers from Austrian women.

Abstract: Since mutagens produce an extraordinary diversity of mutational patterns, differential mutational exposures among populations are expected to produce different patterns of mutation. Classical epidemiological methods have been successful in implicating specific mutagens in cancers such as those of lung and skin in which one mutagen predominates. In breast cancer, however, no mutagens have been implicated in an unequivocal manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the patterns of mutation in high-risk populations reflect the superimposition of a pattern caused by a unique or enhanced exposure to a particular environmental toxin(s) upon an intrinsic (endogenous) pattern of mutation characteristic of low-risk groups. We have shown that the pattern of p53 gene mutations in primary breast cancers in a white, largely rural Midwestern US population (Sommer et al, 1992;Saitoh et al, 1994) and in a population from Graz, Austria (Hartmann et al, 1995a), differs significantly from the pattern present in African -American women from Detroit and from the patterns in Scottish (Coles et al, 1992) and French (Mazars et al, 1992) women. The major differences among these populations are: a predominance of transversions, particularly G:C-+T:A transversions in the Scottish population; a high frequency of microdeletions in the rural white US population; a high frequency of A:T-+T:A transversions in the Austrian population; and a high frequency of transitions, particularly A:T-+G:C transitions, in the African-American population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We assume that the patterns of mutation in high-risk populations reflect the superimposition of a pattern caused by a unique or enhanced exposure to a particular environmental toxin(s) upon an intrinsic (endogenous) pattern of mutation characteristic of low-risk groups. We have shown that the pattern of p53 gene mutations in primary breast cancers in a white, largely rural Midwestern US population (Sommer et al, 1992;Saitoh et al, 1994) and in a population from Graz, Austria (Hartmann et al, 1995a), differs significantly from the pattern present in African -American women from Detroit and from the patterns in Scottish (Coles et al, 1992) and French (Mazars et al, 1992) women. The major differences among these populations are: a predominance of transversions, particularly G:C-+T:A transversions in the Scottish population; a high frequency of microdeletions in the rural white US population; a high frequency of A:T-+T:A transversions in the Austrian population; and a high frequency of transitions, particularly A:T-+G:C transitions, in the African-American population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Many of the differences are substantial because statistical significance was often observed with only relatively few mutations divided among the eight mutational types. The differences are unlikely to be attributed to methodological biases because different patterns were found among six populations analyzed by one laboratory using identical methods Saitoh et al, 1994;Hartmann et al, 1995bHartmann et al, , 1996. The differences between populations with breast cancer are unlikely to represent varying mixtures of just two or three mutagens in diverse populations, given that subanalyses by the Fisher exact test reveal that the differences are attributed to highly distinct patterns of mutations (Table II).…”
Section: P53 Mutation Patterns Vary Among 15 Populationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, Lehman et al, (1993) had previously sequenced the highly conserved region of p53 known as the mutational hot-spot region (exons 4 ± 9) in HMEC184, HMEC184A1 and HMEC184B5 and found a wildtype p53 sequence. However, p53 mutations have been found outside of the hot-spot region in some breast cancers (Hartmann et al, 1995). Therefore, to determine whether HMEC184 contained mutations in p53 outside of the hot-spot region, four primer sets were used to clone the complete p53 coding sequence in HMEC184.…”
Section: Hmec184 Contain Wild-type P53mentioning
confidence: 99%