2006
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200601301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Nanocomposite Pt/RuO2x H2O/Carbon Nanotube Catalysts for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Abstract: Two key problems inhibiting the commercialization of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) are the cost of the precious metals employed and the sluggish kinetics and catalyst poisoning by CO or CHO species. Research to solve the first drawback [1][2][3][4] focuses on the reduction of precious metal loading, which is achieved by increasing the catalysts specific surface area and its accessibility. For the second problem, advanced electrocatalyst design relies on the "bifunctional approach", [5][6][7][8][9][10] in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
111
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
4
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the oxygen defect sites play a major role in removing the carbonaceous species and contribute to the low catalyst poisoning on the Pt/RGO hybrids, in a way similar to that found in Pt/RuO 2 and Pt/Ru/MoO x systems. 14,31,32 Figure S6 in the Supporting Information presents the same dependence as that presented in Figure 5a for a complete series of scan rates ranging from 20 to 200 mV/s. It is clear that, at all scan rates ( Figure S6 in the Supporting Information), the three Pt/RGOs exhibit the same general trend electrodes, displaying much higher I f /I b ratios compared to that of Pt/C, indicating superior antipoisoning behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Hence, the oxygen defect sites play a major role in removing the carbonaceous species and contribute to the low catalyst poisoning on the Pt/RGO hybrids, in a way similar to that found in Pt/RuO 2 and Pt/Ru/MoO x systems. 14,31,32 Figure S6 in the Supporting Information presents the same dependence as that presented in Figure 5a for a complete series of scan rates ranging from 20 to 200 mV/s. It is clear that, at all scan rates ( Figure S6 in the Supporting Information), the three Pt/RGOs exhibit the same general trend electrodes, displaying much higher I f /I b ratios compared to that of Pt/C, indicating superior antipoisoning behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The ligand effect assumes that the energy level of the metal catalyst is modified so that the binding strength with the metal and adsorbed CO is weakened, resulting in a reduction in overpotential for CO oxidation. The possibility that some nanostructured ruthenium oxides (expressed as RuO x H y or RuO 2 •xH 2 O in the literature) may act as co-catalysts has attracted interest and debate [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Several studies have suggested that the binary PtRu alloy structure is not a prerequisite for obtaining the highest activity, and partially oxidized ruthenium species (RuO x ) that are present in the PtRu/C catalysts may contribute to the anodic activity [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have suggested that the binary PtRu alloy structure is not a prerequisite for obtaining the highest activity, and partially oxidized ruthenium species (RuO x ) that are present in the PtRu/C catalysts may contribute to the anodic activity [4][5][6]. Enhancement in methanol oxidation activity has been reported for Pt-RuO 2 composite catalysts although the activity of such material is in general lower than that of PtRu alloy [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. On the contrary, other studies have reported that ruthenium oxide is inactive for CO oxidation [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al modified CNTs with surfactants such as sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) [173]. The hydrophobic aliphatic chain interacted with the surface of the CNTs, while the hydrophilic end attracted the metal ions of the RuCl 3 precursor, which then reacted to form RuO 2 .…”
Section: Noncovalentmentioning
confidence: 99%