2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.11.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel muonium centers—magnetic polarons—in magnetic semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has recently been demonstrated in the related EuS host 17 as well as in other magnetic semiconductors 18 following muon spin relaxation ͑ + SR͒ ͑Ref. 19͒ experiments in insulating 20,21 and semiconducting 22-25 media, which have shown that one of the excess electrons generated in the track can be captured by the muon to form a muonium ͑Muϵ + e − ͒ atom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has recently been demonstrated in the related EuS host 17 as well as in other magnetic semiconductors 18 following muon spin relaxation ͑ + SR͒ ͑Ref. 19͒ experiments in insulating 20,21 and semiconducting 22-25 media, which have shown that one of the excess electrons generated in the track can be captured by the muon to form a muonium ͑Muϵ + e − ͒ atom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5͒ as well as in other magnetic semiconductors. 6 In an AF in the BMP thus formed, the increase in the electron kinetic energy due to localization is expected to be compensated by the on-site exchange interaction IS / 2 of the electron with local spin S combined with Coulomb interaction with the muon as opposed to the energy NJS 2 required to flip N local spins S with the effective exchange energy J of an AF to produce a FM "droplet" within the radius R so that the change in the free energy,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 to suggest two magnetically inequivalent sites occupied by the positive muon in UGe 2 . Although such an approach constitutes the conventional assignment of multiple signals in a magnetically ordered state, fast spin fluctuations make this interpretation irrelevant in the paramagnetic phase 59,60,[62][63][64][65][66] , while possible Knight shifts from the conduction electrons are typically at least 2-3 orders of magnitude smaller than the characteristic splittings detected in this experiment 74 . Moreover, the two peaks do not follow the temperature dependence of the magnetization, which clearly indicates that the muon does not stay "bare" and act as local magnetometer.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 83%
“…In a PM or metallic (or both) environment, the strong pair exchange interaction of the bound electron with itinerant spins (spin exchange 74,78 ) would result in rapid spin fluctuations of this electron, averaging the hyperfine interaction to zerowhich, in turn, would result in a collapse of the doublet into a single line at ν µ (see Ref. 86 for details), if the local FM ordering mediated by this electron did not hold the electron's spin orientation "locked" 59,60,[62][63][64][65][66]85,86 . In metals, however, even the protective local FM environment of a SP does not ensure observation of the doublet unless the SP spin (S) is decoupled from its magnetic environment 59,66,86 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%