2017
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2016.2613905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Multidimensional Models of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Unlike many complex networks studied in the literature, social networks rarely exhibit unanimous behavior, or consensus. This requires a development of mathematical models that are sufficiently simple to be examined and capture, at the same time, the complex behavior of real social groups, where opinions and actions related to them may form clusters of different size. One such model, proposed by Friedkin and Johnsen, extends the idea of conventional consensus algorithm (also referred to as the iterati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
224
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
224
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [29] disagreement is explained as the effect of obstinacy, that is translated into the dependence of any individual's opinion on its initial value. Stubborness as the source of disagreement is also considered in other models, such as [39,42], also in connection with the occurrence of randomized asynchronous interactions [2,25,45]. Another explanation has been proposed to be the presence of contrarians [31] or of negative interactions, i.e.…”
Section: Theorem 8 (Sufficient Conditions For Consensus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29] disagreement is explained as the effect of obstinacy, that is translated into the dependence of any individual's opinion on its initial value. Stubborness as the source of disagreement is also considered in other models, such as [39,42], also in connection with the occurrence of randomized asynchronous interactions [2,25,45]. Another explanation has been proposed to be the presence of contrarians [31] or of negative interactions, i.e.…”
Section: Theorem 8 (Sufficient Conditions For Consensus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also examine the extension of the FJ model to the case of time-varying social influence and give sufficient conditions for its stability. The timevarying FJ model can be further extended to the case of multidimensional opinions, representing the agents' positions on several interrelated issues (belief systems); for static FJ model such an extension is discussed in (Parsegov et al, 2017;Friedkin et al, 2016b). In our future works we are going to validate the applicability of the FJ model to opinion dynamics in large-scale online social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schur stability is a "generic" condition if at least one prejudiced agent exists, and holds, for instance, for a strongly connected influence networks 2 , as implied by the following lemma (Parsegov et al, 2017). Lemma 1.…”
Section: The Friedkin-johnsen Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Opinion dynamics in social networks have been modeled in the context of multi-agent network games [8], [9], [35]. In this subsection, we build upon this literature and conceive opinion dynamics as multi-agent proximal dynamics, possibly multidimensional, interdependent, locally constrained, with possibly time-varying social interactions.…”
Section: Applications a Opinion Dynamics In Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%