2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2232-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel molecular components involved in callose-mediated Arabidopsis defense against Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7

Abstract: Background: Food contamination with Salmonella enterica and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli is among the leading causes of foodborne illnesses worldwide and crop plants are associated with > 50% of the disease outbreaks. However, the mechanisms underlying the interaction of these human pathogens with plants remain elusive. In this study, we have explored plant resistance mechanisms against these enterobacteria and the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3118, as an opportunity to improve … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although S. enterica induces plant defense responses ( Meng et al, 2013 ; Garcia and Hirt, 2014 ; Melotto et al, 2014 ; Oblessuc et al, 2020 ), it can still persist for long periods in the leaf apoplast depending on the bacterial strain and the plant genotype ( Wong et al, 2019 ; Jacob and Melotto, 2020 ). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that variations in the S. enterica culturing conditions, such as temperature and nutrients in the medium ( Kroupitski et al, 2019 ), and environmental conditions for the plant cultivation, such as temperature and humidity ( Deblais et al, 2019 ; Jechalke et al, 2019 ; Roy and Melotto, 2019 ), can interfere mainly with the ability of S. enterica to internalize plant tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although S. enterica induces plant defense responses ( Meng et al, 2013 ; Garcia and Hirt, 2014 ; Melotto et al, 2014 ; Oblessuc et al, 2020 ), it can still persist for long periods in the leaf apoplast depending on the bacterial strain and the plant genotype ( Wong et al, 2019 ; Jacob and Melotto, 2020 ). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that variations in the S. enterica culturing conditions, such as temperature and nutrients in the medium ( Kroupitski et al, 2019 ), and environmental conditions for the plant cultivation, such as temperature and humidity ( Deblais et al, 2019 ; Jechalke et al, 2019 ; Roy and Melotto, 2019 ), can interfere mainly with the ability of S. enterica to internalize plant tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salmonella enterica is one of the most common human pathogens found in fresh produce ( Bennett et al, 2018 ; Melotto et al, 2020 ). Previously, plants were thought to be passive vectors for human pathogens, but recent studies showed that S. enterica can induce plant defense responses ( Meng et al, 2013 ; Garcia and Hirt, 2014 ; Melotto et al, 2014 ; Oblessuc et al, 2020 ). Intriguingly, although the mechanism is not fully understood, this bacterium can overcome plant defense ( Roy et al, 2013 ; Wahlig et al, 2019 ) and survive for weeks inside diverse plants species, including lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) ( Islam et al, 2004 ; Kroupitski et al, 2009 , 2011 ; Jechalke et al, 2019 ; Roy and Melotto, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of competition assays, which have been already used in animal infection studies, is that of minimizing effects due to uncontrolled experimental variability and thus directly comparing the fitness of two different strains in the same niche at the same time. This could be particularly useful in inoculation experiments of plants, where both Salmonella growth conditions and plant status have shown to greatly influence the outcome of the infection ( Kroupitski et al, 2009 ; Oblessuc et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of reads assigned to each gene was determined and read counts were normalized with the log 2 counts per million (CPM) normalization method (Law et al 2016). Similar to a previously described analysis (Oblessuc et al 2020 ), the log 2 fold change (FC) value for each gene was calculated with its normalized expression in Pph - versus mock-inoculated samples, and DEG were called based on the Z-ratio method (Cheadle et al 2003 ). The Z-ratio approach determines which genes have significantly higher FC than other genes in the data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%