2013
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201300383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Methylaluminoxane‐Activated Neodymium Isopropoxide Catalysts for 1,3‐Butadiene Polymerization and 1,3‐Butadiene/Isoprene Copolymerization

Abstract: The homo‐ and copolymerizations of 1,3‐butadiene and isoprene are examined by using neodymium isopropoxide [Nd(Oi‐Pr)3] as a catalyst, in combination with a methylaluminoxane (MAO) cocatalyst. In the homopolymerization of 1,3‐butadiene, the binary Nd(Oi‐Pr)3/MAO catalyst works quite effectively, to afford polymers with high molecular weight (M‾n ≈ 105 g mol‐1), narrow molecular‐weight distribution (MWD) (M‾w/M‾n = 1.4–1.6), and cis‐1,4‐rich structure (87–96%). Ternary catalysts that further contain chlorine so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences between the catalytic activities imply a significant difference in availability of active centers able to initiate the polymerization, which seems to be governed by the different alkylating capacity of the organoaluminum species [14]. The very low catalytic activity observed with MAO as co-catalyst could be attributed to a possible coordination of the alcohol ligand to MAO which led to destabilization of the active site, as it has been reported before for other catalyst systems activated also by MAO [15,16]. It is also noteworthy that the trend of catalytic activity behaved inversely proportional to the bulkiness of the substituents in the co-catalyst, being TEA which led to the highest catalytic activity, substituted by simple ethyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These differences between the catalytic activities imply a significant difference in availability of active centers able to initiate the polymerization, which seems to be governed by the different alkylating capacity of the organoaluminum species [14]. The very low catalytic activity observed with MAO as co-catalyst could be attributed to a possible coordination of the alcohol ligand to MAO which led to destabilization of the active site, as it has been reported before for other catalyst systems activated also by MAO [15,16]. It is also noteworthy that the trend of catalytic activity behaved inversely proportional to the bulkiness of the substituents in the co-catalyst, being TEA which led to the highest catalytic activity, substituted by simple ethyl groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Recently, the polymerization of butadiene employing a binary catalyst system consisting of Nd isopropoxide/ methylaluminoxane [Nd (Oi-Pr) 3 /MAO] was evaluated; this catalyst system was observed to produce the highest cis-1,4 content of 95% when the polymerization was carried out at 30°C, while at 60°C the cis-1,4 content was 86.9% [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visseaux et al reported that a common and unsophisticated compound [Nd(2,6‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐OC 6 H 3 ) 3 ] in combination with methylaluminoxane (MAO) or modified MAO (MMAO) in the absence/presence of Et 2 AlCl are efficient systems to afford polyisoprene with narrow MWD ( M w / M n ∼ 1.6), albeit with low stereoregularity . Recently, we found that the commercially available Nd(O i ‐Pr) 3 /MAO catalyst works effectively in the homo‐ and copolymerization of 1,3‐butadiene and isoprene, affording high cis ‐1,4 (co)polymers with narrow MWD ( M w / M n < 2.0) and that further addition of chlorine sources enhances both cis ‐1,4 selectivity and catalytic activity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%