2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.12.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel method to measure the intrinsic spatial resolution in PET detectors based on monolithic crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the whole assembly was placed inside a light tight box. A 22 Na source (1 mm in diameter, 475 kBq) was used for all experiments. All results mentioned below, have been obtained after applying about 30% (350-650 keV) energy window around the 511 keV photopeak.…”
Section: Detector Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the whole assembly was placed inside a light tight box. A 22 Na source (1 mm in diameter, 475 kBq) was used for all experiments. All results mentioned below, have been obtained after applying about 30% (350-650 keV) energy window around the 511 keV photopeak.…”
Section: Detector Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In monolithic blocks the scintillation photons are isotropically emitted travelling straight in all directions, differently from the pixelated crystal case in which the optical photons are trapped inside bouncing on the walls until they reach one photosensor. The light spread in the monolithic block permits an accurate position decoding of the gamma ray impact, being a convenient choice for a high intrinsic detector spatial resolution [22]. In addition to the position, a monolithic scintillator could ideally show a better timing performance compared to a pixelated one, due to the fact that the generated optical photons are not suffering from the aforementioned internal reflections inside the crystal pixel introducing time delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D images were generated in a binary raw file with a matrix size of 416 × 416 × 50 voxels with 1 × 1 × 1 mm 3 voxel size. Since monolithic crystals allow one to define the pixel size, somehow based on the measured detector resolution [24], we have selected virtual detector pixels of 1 × 1 mm 2 , which is also a compromise between statistics and computational cost.…”
Section: Castor Reconstruction Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was placed at the scanner center FOV. The phantom has a drilled hole of 3.2 mm in diameter and at 13 mm off-radial direction [24]. Through this hole, a silicone tube (170 mm Fig.…”
Section: Count Rate Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of the monolithic system include reduced manufacturing costs of designs compared to pixelated crystals with decreasing cross section, a maximized detection efficiency due to reduced dead space, and also direct application of an inherent correction for depth of interaction, the effects of which can be important for PET systems with a small ring diameter such as preclinical or organ-specific systems. Current commercial and research systems have employed monolithic crystals for imaging purposes up to sizes of 50 mm × 50 mm × 20 mm [42,43]. Potential issues with monolithic crystal imaging include lower signal-to-noise (SNR) due to a wider spread of scintillation light compared to one-to-one coupling.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%