Novel Method for the Classification of Shale Oil Reservoirs Associated with Mobility: Inspiration from Gas Adsorption and Multiple Isothermal Stage Pyrolysis

Abstract

The characterization and description of pores in shale oil reservoirs have long been based on the classification of micropores (<2 nm), mesopores (2–50 nm), and macropores (>50 nm) in shale gas reservoirs. However, the great difference between oil and gas molecules leads to its poor applicability, which further results in the relationship between oil properties and pores being rarely understood. To establish an individual pore division method for shale oil reservoirs, N2 adsorption, Soxhlet extraction, and programmed pyrolysis were performed on the Paleogene Xin’gouzui lacustrine shale in the Jianghan Basin. With the results, a new classification method, i.e., adsorption pores (pore diameter <20 nm), restricted pores (20–100 nm), and movable pores (>100 nm), was proposed. A fractal theory and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images confirm the rationality of this method. Hydrocarbons in movable pores determine the initial productivity of a shale oil well, while those in restricted pores are closely related to the production time of a well to some extent. Compared to the previous division methods, this novel method reveals the correlation between shale oil attributes as well as movability and pore spaces for the first time. Our work can provide more accurate evaluation results for shale oil recoverable resource potential and is of great significance for optimizing favorable areas and reducing exploration risks.

Geological Controls on Reservoir Characteristics Influencing Shale Oil Occurrence in Lacustrine Mixed Fine-Grained Sediments of the Paleogene Funing Formation, Subei Basin

“…Fractal dimension can be used to characterize pore structure. , The N 2 adsorption process can be divided into two relative pressure intervals (0 < P / P 0 < 0.42 and 0.42 < P / P 0 < 1) based on nitrogen adsorption isothermal curve and fractal theory (Figure a,c,e,f). When the relative pressure is lower than 0.42 ( P / P 0 < 0.42), the N 2 adsorption and desorption isotherms overlap.…”

“…Hydrocarbon generation potential is a key parameter for evaluating the oil production capacity of shale. , Common parameters for the quantitative evaluation of shale oil generation potential include thermal maturity (Ro), TOC content, free hydrocarbon (S1), chloroform asphalt “A”, and T max . ,− Recent studies have shown that lower maturity is often accompanied by mineral-related pore development, facilitating the enrichment of oil and gas in the shale. , Multistage Rock-Eval technology is used to evaluate the content of free and adsorbed oil in shale, with S1–1 and S1–2 representing free oil and S2–2 representing adsorbed oil. ,, …”