2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel mesoporous FeAl bimetal oxides for As(III) removal: Performance and mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, only one peak could be assigned to each spectrum after As­(V) or As­(III) sorption, suggesting that their oxidation states did not change during the sorption process. Although there was no report in literature on the binding energy of arsenic adsorbed onto La-based materials, the binding energy of As­(V) is usually 0.7–1.3 eV higher than that of As­(III); thus, the binding energies at 44.4 and 43.7 eV could be assigned to As­(V) and As­(III), respectively. This result suggested oxidation states of As­(V) and As­(III) on the ceramic surface did not change during the sorption process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, only one peak could be assigned to each spectrum after As­(V) or As­(III) sorption, suggesting that their oxidation states did not change during the sorption process. Although there was no report in literature on the binding energy of arsenic adsorbed onto La-based materials, the binding energy of As­(V) is usually 0.7–1.3 eV higher than that of As­(III); thus, the binding energies at 44.4 and 43.7 eV could be assigned to As­(V) and As­(III), respectively. This result suggested oxidation states of As­(V) and As­(III) on the ceramic surface did not change during the sorption process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggested oxidation states of As(V) and As(III) on the ceramic surface did not change during the sorption process. The observed binding energies for both As(V) and As(III) were lower than those adsorbed onto other metal oxides, 53,56 indicating the strong interaction between arsenic and the La surface that might alter the coordination environments of As(V) and As(III). Additionally, the As 3d spectrum of pure LaAsO 4 was also obtained as a reference, and the As(V) binding energy was in close agreement to the As(V)-loaded Lacoated ceramic material (Figure 4c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Arsenic pollution is a great concern because of its toxicity and carcinogenicity with respect to human health (Ding, Fu, Cheng, Lu, & Bing, ). It is a common groundwater contaminant and mainly occurs in inorganic forms, such as arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) species (Wan et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic removal by adsorbents largely depends on solution pH, increasing the difficulty of wastewater disposal considering the wide pH range of contaminated water. However, it is relatively difficult to remove arsenite (As(III)), which can remain in the form of H 3 AsO 3 when the pH is lower than 9.2 [ 16 , 17 ]. Previous research indicated that uncharged H 3 AsO 3 is more difficult to remove using traditional physical-chemical treatment methods [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%