The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jisa.2021.103107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Hybrid Model for Intrusion Prediction on Cyber Physical Systems’ Communication Networks based on Bio-inspired Deep Neural Network Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following evaluation metrics are used to assess the performance of our approach as well as other comparative approaches. These are standard evaluation metrics, which have been used in several other works [8,19].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following evaluation metrics are used to assess the performance of our approach as well as other comparative approaches. These are standard evaluation metrics, which have been used in several other works [8,19].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the GRU method was executed for identifying the occurrence of intrusions from the industrial CPS environments. The authors in [18] primarily present a new self-learning spatial distribution technique called Euclidean distance-based between-class learning (EBC learning) that enhances between-class learning by computing the Euclidean distance (ED) amongst KNN of distinct classes. Moreover, a cognitive computing-based ID model termed order-line SMOTE and EBC learning dependent upon RF (BSBC-RF) is also presented as dependent upon EBC learning to industrial CPSs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class with the maximum probability was assumed as the prediction label y pred of x input vector, as determined in Equation (17). The predictive error of sample dataset D(Loss(D)) is evaluated according to the true label, as demonstrated in Equation (18), where y i indicates the true label of x i . Loss(D) is minimalized by the Gradient Descent model that is the same as the procedure of minimalizing the abovementioned reconstruction error:…”
Section: Hyperparameter Tuning Using Cso Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of hyperparameters can be viewed as an optimization issue in which the objective is to maximize the accuracy of fitness functions while minimizing the inaccuracy of cost functions [6]. Manually fine-tuning these hyper-parameters is a challenging task [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%