2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.11.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel heterocyclic DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lipophilic S 1 pocket is considered a crucial molecular anchor point for DPP‐IV inhibitors, and the residues that constitute this pocket are conserved among the peptidases DPP‐IV, DPP8, and DPP9 . Figure and Supporting Information Figure describe two different ways for increasing the bioactivity of DPP‐IV inhibitors through hydrophobic interactions with the S 1 pocket: (a) replacing a but‐2‐yn‐1‐yl substituent by a prenyl group (with associated improvements in bioactivity in a 1.7 to 125‐fold range; see Figure A and Supporting Information Figure A–G); and (b) replacing a monobutyl substituent by either an m‐tolyl or a phenyl group (with respectively 113‐ and 2.6‐fold associated improvements in bioactivity; see Figure B and Supporting Information Figure H) . In all the comparisons in Figure and Supporting Information Figure we observe a tendency in which those compounds presenting a better occupancy of the S 1 pocket achieved higher bioactivities.…”
Section: How To Favor Potent and Selective Dpp‐iv Inhibitors Accordinmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lipophilic S 1 pocket is considered a crucial molecular anchor point for DPP‐IV inhibitors, and the residues that constitute this pocket are conserved among the peptidases DPP‐IV, DPP8, and DPP9 . Figure and Supporting Information Figure describe two different ways for increasing the bioactivity of DPP‐IV inhibitors through hydrophobic interactions with the S 1 pocket: (a) replacing a but‐2‐yn‐1‐yl substituent by a prenyl group (with associated improvements in bioactivity in a 1.7 to 125‐fold range; see Figure A and Supporting Information Figure A–G); and (b) replacing a monobutyl substituent by either an m‐tolyl or a phenyl group (with respectively 113‐ and 2.6‐fold associated improvements in bioactivity; see Figure B and Supporting Information Figure H) . In all the comparisons in Figure and Supporting Information Figure we observe a tendency in which those compounds presenting a better occupancy of the S 1 pocket achieved higher bioactivities.…”
Section: How To Favor Potent and Selective Dpp‐iv Inhibitors Accordinmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The blue dashed line shows the π–π interaction between the 22f‐trans ligand and Tyr666 (this π–π interaction was calculated with the help of Maestro using default options). In panel A a but‐2‐yn‐1‐yl substituent in the S 1 subsite is replaced by a prenyl substituent, while in panel B a monobutyl group is replaced by an m‐tolyl group . The ligand orientations are the result of their superposition with co‐crystallized ligands from the same or very similar chemical series (i.e., 4A5S for panel A and 3KWF for panel B ; residue locations in each panel are also taken from this PDB file).…”
Section: How To Favor Potent and Selective Dpp‐iv Inhibitors Accordinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The docking score (GBVI/ WSA dG) for all food peptides (IPP, VPP, IY and VY) was less than À 10, supporting that peptides bind to the active site in the ACE (Table 5). [54] Figure 8 shows that the food peptide interacts with the binding site of the known inhibitor in DPP4. The results support that the peptides inhibited the function of the ACE and hydrolytic cleavage of angiotensin I, and were consistent with the GCNN prediction.…”
Section: Structural Analysis Of Peptide-target Interactions Using Docmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitors stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, DPP-4 inhibitors present lower risks on hypoglycemia and may not lead to weight gain, also protect pancreatic beta cells. The up-regulation of gastric inhibitory polypeptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide by DPP-4 inhibitor also result in blood glucose reduction [6,7]. Clinical data indicate that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors, in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs result in significantly improved glycemic control compared with DPP-4 inhibitor or metformin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%